Re: ceph-brag ready

[Sebastien Han <sebastien.han@enovance.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3042 bytes --]

Hey Sage,

Sorry for the late reply.
It was good to see you as well :).

Babu took (in cc) took care of the changes, he is about to push a PR for this.

Cheers.
–––– 
Sébastien Han 
Cloud Engineer 

"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood.” 

Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72 
Mail: sebastien.han@enovance.com 
Address : 11 bis, rue Roquépine - 75008 Paris
Web : www.enovance.com - Twitter : @enovance 

On 04 Mar 2014, at 00:35, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com> wrote:

> Hi Sebastien,
> 
> Good seeing you last week in Frankfurt!
> 
> I meant to follow up earlier (or hack on this a bit myself) but haven't 
> had time.  After taking a look, my wish list here would be:
> 
> - simplify the 'bytes' info to just be bytes.
> 
> - maybe prefix these all with 'num_'
> 
> - for crush_types, make it a map of type to count, so we can tell how many 
> racks/rows/hosts/etc there are.
> 
> - i wouldn't include the pool names in the pool metadata; that is probably 
> too sensitive.
> 
> - but, we can include 'type' (replicated|erasure) and change 'rep_size' to 
> 'size' (which is a more general name)
> 
> - for sysinfo, i would remove nw_info entirely?  not sure what this would 
> be for, but generally if there is any identifying info people will not 
> want to use this
> 
> - for all the other metadata, i wonder if it would be better to break it 
> down into a histogram (like the crush types) with a value and count, so 
> that we just see how many of each version/distro/kernel/os/arch/cpu/etc 
> are running.  unless people think it would be useful to see how they 
> correlate?
> 
> In general, it seems like the more compact the info is, the easier and 
> more likely it is for a person to look at it, see it is safe to share, and 
> then do so.
> 
> Thanks!
> sage
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Sebastien Han wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for the late response Sage..
>> As discussed on IRC, LGPL is fine.
>> 
>> Thanks for taking care of this :)
>> 
>> Cheers.
>> –––– 
>> Sébastien Han 
>> Cloud Engineer 
>> 
>> "Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood.” 
>> 
>> Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72 
>> Mail: sebastien.han@enovance.com 
>> Address : 10, rue de la Victoire - 75009 Paris 
>> Web : www.enovance.com - Twitter : @enovance 
>> 
>> On 15 Feb 2014, at 18:43, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Sebastien Han wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> 
>>>> First implementation of the ceph-brag is ready.
>>>> We have a public repo available here, so can try it out.
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/enovance/ceph-brag
>>>> 
>>>> However I don’t have any idea on how to submit this to github.com/ceph.
>>>> Can someone help me on that?
>>> 
>>> I'm merging this into ceph.git now (src/brag/{client, server}).  I don't 
>>> see Signed-off-by lines on the commits, though, or an indication of what 
>>> the license is.  Can you confirm whether this should be LGPL or MIT or 
>>> whatever?
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> sage
>> 


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 496 bytes --]