From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew McClintock Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:43:18 -0600 Message-ID: <59152C1B-683F-417D-9C23-C6E3F53D7096@codeaurora.org> References: <1447975173-29485-1-git-send-email-mmcclint@qca.qualcomm.com> <1447975173-29485-6-git-send-email-mmcclint@qca.qualcomm.com> <20160208224328.GB10791@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:35994 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932459AbcBPUnW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:43:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160208224328.GB10791@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Matthew McClintock , Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qca-upstream.external@qca.qualcomm.com, Senthilkumar N L , Varadarajan Narayanan On Feb 8, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >=20 > On 11/19, Matthew McClintock wrote: >> + >> +/ { >> + model =3D "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ4019/AP-DK01.1"; >> + compatible =3D "qcom,ipq4019"; >> + >> + clocks { >> + xo: xo { >> + compatible =3D "fixed-clock"; >> + clock-frequency =3D <48000000>; >> + #clock-cells =3D <0>; >> + }; >> + }; >=20 > Is there a reason the xo is here and the sleep clk is in the SoC > dtsi file? Both are board clocks so I would think they would be > added in the same place. I=E2=80=99m a little bit confused and I wanted to confirm. I can see th= e xo clock is on the board itself. However, the sleep_clk is not, can y= ou clarify why they would both be in the same place? -M-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933253AbcBPUn0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:43:26 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:35994 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932459AbcBPUnW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:43:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Matthew McClintock In-Reply-To: <20160208224328.GB10791@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:43:18 -0600 Cc: Matthew McClintock , Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qca-upstream.external@qca.qualcomm.com, Senthilkumar N L , Varadarajan Narayanan Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <59152C1B-683F-417D-9C23-C6E3F53D7096@codeaurora.org> References: <1447975173-29485-1-git-send-email-mmcclint@qca.qualcomm.com> <1447975173-29485-6-git-send-email-mmcclint@qca.qualcomm.com> <20160208224328.GB10791@codeaurora.org> To: Stephen Boyd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Feb 8, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 11/19, Matthew McClintock wrote: >> + >> +/ { >> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ4019/AP-DK01.1"; >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq4019"; >> + >> + clocks { >> + xo: xo { >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >> + clock-frequency = <48000000>; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + }; > > Is there a reason the xo is here and the sleep clk is in the SoC > dtsi file? Both are board clocks so I would think they would be > added in the same place. I’m a little bit confused and I wanted to confirm. I can see the xo clock is on the board itself. However, the sleep_clk is not, can you clarify why they would both be in the same place? -M From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mmcclint@codeaurora.org (Matthew McClintock) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:43:18 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board In-Reply-To: <20160208224328.GB10791@codeaurora.org> References: <1447975173-29485-1-git-send-email-mmcclint@qca.qualcomm.com> <1447975173-29485-6-git-send-email-mmcclint@qca.qualcomm.com> <20160208224328.GB10791@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <59152C1B-683F-417D-9C23-C6E3F53D7096@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Feb 8, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 11/19, Matthew McClintock wrote: >> + >> +/ { >> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ4019/AP-DK01.1"; >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq4019"; >> + >> + clocks { >> + xo: xo { >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >> + clock-frequency = <48000000>; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + }; > > Is there a reason the xo is here and the sleep clk is in the SoC > dtsi file? Both are board clocks so I would think they would be > added in the same place. I?m a little bit confused and I wanted to confirm. I can see the xo clock is on the board itself. However, the sleep_clk is not, can you clarify why they would both be in the same place? -M