All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: sylvain.bertrand@gmail.com
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: sw_params for a direct-ed(dmix) hw pcm
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:34:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59266c58-96d8-93e9-bc8f-86e9fccf8d60@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200328203744.GA2398@freedom>



On 3/28/20 3:37 PM, sylvain.bertrand@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 02:15:34PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> I don't think it's possible unless the timestamps are taken really close to
>> each other. There was some work some by Chris Hall in 2016 to revisit how
>> the conversions were done and the past taken into account is a couple of ms,
>> see ("time: Add history to cross timestamp interface supporting slower
>> devices").
>>
>> if your device is "shared", which implies a mixer, the notion of precise
>> timestamps is rather questionable so you might be able to get-by with local
>> interpolation in your plug-ins. Trying a full-blown conversion of the
>> kernel-reported time is not really useful if the mixing granularity is in
>> the ms range or more.
>>
>> FWIW you also want to take MONOTONIC_RAW with a grain of salt. In a corner
>> case w/ long tests lasting 48 hours we saw the timestamps reported by the
>> kernel drift over time. the drift was minor (double-digit ppb - yes parts
>> per billion) but the fixed-point math for the counters at some point impacts
>> the results. Reading directly the TSC from userspace and doing
>> floating-point math bypassed the rounding errors.
> 
> This is how I got into this: I was writting a naive audio application and
> arrived at the point I needed timing information to do exactly that, a rough,
> but enough, audio linear interpolation (with ffmpeg timestamp). I naively
> configured alsa to use monotonic_raw, because avoiding ntp for audio timing was
> a good idea, and when I did sample on my side the monotonic raw clock, I
> realised that everything was off 100s of ms (alsa defaults to monotonic and
> ignores monotonic_raw setting in the case of a shared device). I followed the
> white rabbit, and here I stand. The cherry on top was the inconsistency about
> the trigger timestamp (which is not meant to be close to the other timestamps).
> 
> This pushes to fix snd_pcm_sw_params_set_tstamp_type(): recursive along a pcm
> plugin "pipeline" and return an error in the case of a setting difference from
> the one chosen by dmix.
> I am not confident at all since I have only a minimal perspective on alsa.

Using MONOTONIC_RAW is very nice on paper, until you realize you can't 
program a timer using the information. You can only read the timestamp 
and not really do much if you want to sleep/wait.

In practice, if you really really need super-precise information you'll 
get use rdtsc(), and apply you own formulas. And otherwise stick with 
MONOTONIC, it's rather unlikely you will ever notice the NTP changes. 
PulseAudio, CRAS and a number of Android HALs use MONOTONIC and nobody 
ever complained.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-28 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-21 15:53 monotonic raw setup seems buggy sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-25 17:44 ` sw_params for a direct-ed(dmix) hw pcm sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-26 12:02   ` Kai Vehmanen
2020-03-26 14:36     ` Jaroslav Kysela
2020-03-26 20:04       ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-27  8:08         ` Takashi Iwai
2020-03-27  9:40           ` Jaroslav Kysela
2020-03-28 18:26             ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-28 19:15               ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-28 20:37                 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-28 21:34                   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2020-03-28 22:20                     ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-29  7:43                       ` Takashi Iwai
2020-03-31 11:32                         ` Takashi Iwai
2020-04-01 15:25                           ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-04-01 15:59                             ` Takashi Iwai
2020-04-01 20:21                               ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-04-02 19:03                                 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-04-06 13:49                                   ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-04-14 15:18                                     ` Takashi Iwai
2020-04-14 23:20                                       ` sylvain.bertrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59266c58-96d8-93e9-bc8f-86e9fccf8d60@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sylvain.bertrand@gmail.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.