From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacek Anaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for lm3697 driver Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:07:55 +0200 Message-ID: <59561e0f-e3b9-7898-a300-90b198ad14e6@gmail.com> References: <20180906135005.6718-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20180906211617.GB16899@amd> <20180907133228.GA16297@amd> <70f7506c-6a3d-3830-59a4-a246dc6163f7@ti.com> <226b8770-7041-39a4-5a06-6002a7c1225f@gmail.com> <20a814ce-a4c5-0649-6677-6b85a5fd2321@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20a814ce-a4c5-0649-6677-6b85a5fd2321@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Murphy , Pavel Machek Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Dan, Pavel, On 09/10/2018 04:37 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Jacek > > On 09/08/2018 02:53 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >> Dan, >> >> On 09/07/2018 03:52 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >> [...] >>>> >>>>> And I think Jacek pointed out that the bindings references in this bindings >>>>> don't even exist. >>>>> >>>>> I am thinking we need to deprecate this MFD driver and consolidate these drivers >>>>> in the LED directory as we indicated before. I did not find any ti-lmu support >>>>> code. >>>>> >>>>> ti-lmu common core code and then the LED children appending the feature differentiation. >>>> >>>>> Need some maintainer weigh in here. >>>> >>>> Hehe. I'm maintnainer. Fun. >>> >>> I know. I want to see if there was any other opinion. Especially for the LED driver. >>> >> [...] >> >> I have a question - is this lm3697 LED controller a cell of some MFD >> device? Or is it a self-contained chip? >> > > This is a self contained chip. And the LM3697 only function is a LED driver. > It does not have any other special functions like the LM363X drivers for GPIO and Regulator support. This is an argument for merging it as a standalone LED class driver then. It is even more justifiable, taking into account uncertainties related to the proper way of adding the support for it to the existing MFD driver, whereas the code reuse would be the only advantage of having thus support in MFD subsystem. -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski