All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Konstantin Svist <fry.kun@gmail.com>
Cc: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Trying to recover data from SSD
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:19:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <597bd681-c7ba-075c-4376-142695b91f93@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0ebdff7-10f0-c8f3-e098-18f651a149d8@gmail.com>



On 2021/8/29 下午2:34, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> On 8/28/21 16:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/8/29 上午7:16, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>>> On 8/27/21 23:16, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2021/8/28 下午1:57, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>>>>> On 8/20/21 19:56, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/11/21 18:18, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2021/8/12 上午6:34, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>>>>>>>> Shouldn't there be an earlier generation of this subvolume's tree
>>>>>>>> block
>>>>>>>> somewhere on the disk? Would all of them have gotten overwritten
>>>>>>>> already?
>>>>>>> Then it will be more complex and I can't ensure any good result.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was already pretty complex and results were never guaranteed :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Firstly you need to find an older root tree:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # btrfs ins dump-super -f /dev/sdb3 | grep backup_tree_root
>>>>>>>                    backup_tree_root:       30687232        gen: 2317
>>>>>>>     level: 0
>>>>>>>                    backup_tree_root:       30834688        gen: 2318
>>>>>>>     level: 0
>>>>>>>                    backup_tree_root:       30408704        gen: 2319
>>>>>>>     level: 0
>>>>>>>                    backup_tree_root:       31031296        gen: 2316
>>>>>>>     level: 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then try the bytenr in their reverse generation order in btrfs ins
>>>>>>> dump-tree:
>>>>>>> (The latest one should be the current root, thus you can skip it)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # btrfs ins dump-tree -b 30834688 /dev/sdb3 | grep "(257 ROOT_ITEM"
>>>>>>> -A 5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then grab the bytenr of the subvolume 257, then pass the bytenr to
>>>>>>> btrfs-restore:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # btrfs-restore -f <bytenr> /dev/sdb3 <restore_path>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The chance is already pretty low, good luck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Qu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I run dump-tree, I get this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # btrfs ins dump-tree -b 787070976 /dev/sdb3 | grep "(257 ROOT_ITEM"
>>>>>> -A 5
>>>>>> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found
>>>>>> 0xc375d6b6
>>>>>> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found
>>>>>> 0xc375d6b6
>>>>>> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found
>>>>>> 0xc375d6b6
>>>>>> Csum didn't match
>>>>>> WARNING: could not setup extent tree, skipping it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The same exact offset fails checksum for all 4 backup roots, any way
>>>>>> around this?
>>>>
>>>> When without the grep, is there any output?
>>>
>>>
>>> # btrfs ins dump-tree -b 787070976 /dev/sdb3
>>> btrfs-progs v5.13.1
>>> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found 0xc375d6b6
>>> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found 0xc375d6b6
>>> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found 0xc375d6b6
>>> Csum didn't match
>>> WARNING: could not setup extent tree, skipping it
>>> node 787070976 level 1 items 7 free space 486 generation 166932 owner
>>> ROOT_TREE
>>> node 787070976 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
>>> fs uuid 44a768e0-28ba-4c6a-8eef-18ffa8c27d1b
>>> chunk uuid a8a06213-eebf-40d8-ab1a-914f621fbe1c
>>>       key (EXTENT_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0) block 787087360 gen 166932
>>>       key (277 INODE_ITEM 0) block 197491195904 gen 56511
>>>       key (305 INODE_ITEM 0) block 778174464 gen 166929
>>>       key (366 EXTENT_DATA 0) block 197491949568 gen 56511
>>>       key (428 INODE_ITEM 0) block 36175872 gen 166829
>>>       key (476 INODE_ITEM 0) block 787234816 gen 166932
>>>       key (FREE_SPACE UNTYPED 99888398336) block 780812288 gen 166929
>>
>> My bad, I forgot to add "--follow" option for "btrfs ins dump-tree"
>>
>> So the full command is:
>>
>> $ btrfs ins dump-tree -b 787070976 --follow /dev/sdb3
>>
>> Then you should be able to find "(257 ROOT_ITEM".
>>
>
> # btrfs ins dump-tree -b 787070976 --follow /dev/sdb3 | grep "(257
> ROOT_ITEM" -A 5
> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found 0xc375d6b6
> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found 0xc375d6b6
> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found 0xc375d6b6
> Csum didn't match
> WARNING: could not setup extent tree, skipping it
>      item 13 key (257 ROOT_ITEM 0) itemoff 13147 itemsize 439
>          generation 166932 root_dirid 256 bytenr 786726912 level 2 refs 1
>          lastsnap 56690 byte_limit 0 bytes_used 1013104640 flags 0x0(none)
>          uuid 1ac60d28-6f11-2842-aca2-b1574b108336
>          ctransid 166932 otransid 8 stransid 0 rtransid 0
>          ctime 1627959592.718936423 (2021-08-02 19:59:52)
>
>
> # btrfs restore -Divf 786726912 /dev/sdb3 .
> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found 0xc375d6b6
> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found 0xc375d6b6
> checksum verify failed on 786939904 wanted 0xcdcdcdcd found 0xc375d6b6
> Csum didn't match
> WARNING: could not setup extent tree, skipping it
> This is a dry-run, no files are going to be restored
> checksum verify failed on 920748032 wanted 0x00000000 found 0xb6bde3e4
> checksum verify failed on 920748032 wanted 0x00000000 found 0xb6bde3e4
> checksum verify failed on 920748032 wanted 0x00000000 found 0xb6bde3e4
> bad tree block 920748032, bytenr mismatch, want=920748032, have=0
> ERROR: search for next directory entry failed: -5

This all zero means the data on-disk are wiped.

Either not reaching disk or discarded.

Neither is a good thing.

>
>
> 1st set of "checksum verify failed" has different addresses, but the
> last set always has 920748032

Have you tried other bytenrs from find-root?

Thanks,
Qu
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-29  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-10  4:41 Trying to recover data from SSD Konstantin Svist
2021-08-10  5:24 ` Qu Wenruo
     [not found]   ` <CADQtc0=GDa-v_byewDmUHqr-TrX_S734ezwhLYL9OSkX-jcNOw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-08-10  6:56     ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-10 16:12       ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-10 22:24         ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-10 23:21           ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-10 23:54             ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-11  5:22               ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-11  5:24                 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-11  5:34                   ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-11  5:49                     ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-11 19:33                       ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-11 21:51                         ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-11 22:34                           ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-12  1:18                             ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-21  2:56                               ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-28  5:57                                 ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-28  6:16                                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-28 23:16                                     ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-28 23:30                                       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-29  6:34                                         ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-29  7:19                                           ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-08-29 20:02                                             ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-30  0:22                                               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-30  3:48                                                 ` Konstantin Svist
2021-08-30  7:20                                                   ` Qu Wenruo
     [not found]                                                     ` <aa33b83f-b822-b1d8-9fe4-5cf4ab45c3e1@gmail.com>
2021-08-31 11:05                                                       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-09-01  1:38                                                         ` Konstantin Svist
2021-09-01  1:47                                                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-11  0:30       ` Zygo Blaxell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=597bd681-c7ba-075c-4376-142695b91f93@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=fry.kun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.