Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm: Use mfn_t for new_guest_cr3()

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>]

>>> On 30.08.17 at 14:19, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> @@ -2772,23 +2772,23 @@ int vcpu_destroy_pagetables(struct vcpu *v)
>      return rc != -EINTR ? rc : -ERESTART;
>  }
>  
> -int new_guest_cr3(unsigned long mfn)
> +int new_guest_cr3(mfn_t mfn)
>  {
>      struct vcpu *curr = current;
>      struct domain *d = curr->domain;
>      int rc;
> -    unsigned long old_base_mfn;
> +    mfn_t old_base_mfn;
>  
>      if ( is_pv_32bit_domain(d) )
>      {
> -        unsigned long gt_mfn = pagetable_get_pfn(curr->arch.guest_table);
> -        l4_pgentry_t *pl4e = map_domain_page(_mfn(gt_mfn));
> +        mfn_t mmfn = pagetable_get_mfn(curr->arch.guest_table);
> +        l4_pgentry_t *pl4e = map_domain_page(mmfn);

What was wrong with "gt_mfn" for "guest table MFN"? I can't help
thinking mmfn is a typo, where you've hit the m key one too many
times. What is that first m supposed to stand for?

Other than this the patch is certainly fine.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel