From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] x86emul: support F16C insns
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 04:24:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59BA74FB020000780017B094@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZbHZOawUdXHEtkskcg7FFEw6fhCNypY6Nc-6mWKfmovLw@mail.gmail.com>
>>> On 14.09.17 at 11:13, <george.dunlap@citrix.com> wrote:
> I see now -- you're using a construct that is common all over the code.
>
> I think the construct could probably use changing, but currently for
> readability it's probably better to follow suit.
Perhaps, though at the time I couldn't think of anything that would
look better, work, and not result in overly much larger code size.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-14 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-21 11:23 [PATCH 00/17] x86: emulator enhancements Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 11:59 ` [PATCH 01/17] x86emul: support remaining AVX insns Jan Beulich
2017-09-13 15:02 ` George Dunlap
2017-09-13 15:31 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 11:59 ` [PATCH 02/17] x86emul: re-order cases of main switch statement Jan Beulich
2017-09-13 15:15 ` George Dunlap
2017-06-21 12:00 ` [PATCH 03/17] x86emul: build SIMD tests with -Os Jan Beulich
2017-09-13 15:19 ` George Dunlap
2017-09-13 15:34 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:01 ` [PATCH 04/17] x86emul: support F16C insns Jan Beulich
2017-09-13 17:10 ` George Dunlap
2017-09-14 9:13 ` George Dunlap
2017-09-14 10:24 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2017-06-21 12:01 ` [PATCH 05/17] x86emul: support FMA4 insns Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:02 ` [PATCH 06/17] x86emul: support FMA insns Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:02 ` [PATCH 07/17] x86emul: support most remaining AVX2 insns Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 08/17] x86emul: fold/eliminate some local variables Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:04 ` [PATCH 09/17] x86emul: support AVX2 gather insns Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:04 ` [PATCH 10/17] x86emul: add tables for XOP 08 and 09 extension spaces Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:05 ` [PATCH 11/17] x86emul: support XOP insns Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:05 ` [PATCH 12/17] x86emul: support 3DNow! insns Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 13/17] x86emul: re-order checks in test harness Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:07 ` [PATCH 14/17] x86emul: abstract out XCRn accesses Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:07 ` [PATCH 15/17] x86emul: adjust_bnd() should check XCR0 Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:08 ` [PATCH 16/17] x86emul: make all FPU emulation use the stub Jan Beulich
2017-06-21 12:09 ` [PATCH 17/17] x86/HVM: eliminate custom #MF/#XM handling Jan Beulich
2017-09-05 17:08 ` [PATCH 00/17] x86: emulator enhancements George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59BA74FB020000780017B094@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.