From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753157AbdJTMBl (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 08:01:41 -0400 Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.130]:33238 "EHLO regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753114AbdJTMBk (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 08:01:40 -0400 X-263anti-spam: KSV:0;BIG:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ADDR-CHECKED4: 1 X-ABS-CHECKED: 1 X-SKE-CHECKED: 1 X-ANTISPAM-LEVEL: 2 X-RL-SENDER: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: rjw@rjwysocki.net X-SENDER-IP: 103.29.142.67 X-LOGIN-NAME: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: <991875c862d1707c1fe4f0ca2e6e254a> X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Message-ID: <59E9E59E.5030609@rock-chips.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:01:34 +0800 From: jeffy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130126 Thunderbird/19.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Greg KH CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, briannorris@chromium.org, heiko@sntech.de, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dianders@chromium.org, tfiga@chromium.org, broonie@kernel.org, seanpaul@chromium.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] driver core: Move device_links_purge() after bus_remove_device() References: <20171020012316.30154-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <3413769.dlVTNxayVy@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171020062201.GA18761@kroah.com> <2944574.zGy8XCJarq@aspire.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <2944574.zGy8XCJarq@aspire.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, On 10/20/2017 07:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Technically the problem has always been there, but it is only visible if > device links are used in a specific way and I'm not sure whether or not > there is any code in the tree where that's the case. > > That said AFAICS it should be safe to add > > Fixes: 9ed9895370ae (driver core: Functional dependencies tracking support) right, forgot to do so, thanks for noticing :) > > to it and handle it accordingly. > > Thanks, > Rafael