From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: + checkpatch-printks-always-need-a-kern_level.patch added to -mm tree Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:37:43 -0700 Message-ID: <59d40327.i/nNSoz/Eq0JEOsF%akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52486 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750841AbdJCVho (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:37:44 -0400 Sender: mm-commits-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org To: joe@perches.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org The patch titled Subject: checkpatch: printks always need a KERN_ has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is checkpatch-printks-always-need-a-kern_level.patch This patch should soon appear at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/checkpatch-printks-always-need-a-kern_level.patch and later at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/checkpatch-printks-always-need-a-kern_level.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Joe Perches Subject: checkpatch: printks always need a KERN_ There was code in checkpatch that allowed continuation printks to be used without KERN_CONT. Remove the continuation check and always require a KERN_. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/61980ef41d5b9b6543da1c49055042e0ab74d308.1507047008.git.joe@perches.com Signed-off-by: Joe Perches Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 26 ++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff -puN scripts/checkpatch.pl~checkpatch-printks-always-need-a-kern_level scripts/checkpatch.pl --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl~checkpatch-printks-always-need-a-kern_level +++ a/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -3829,28 +3829,10 @@ sub process { "Prefer printk_ratelimited or pr__ratelimited to printk_ratelimit\n" . $herecurr); } -# printk should use KERN_* levels. Note that follow on printk's on the -# same line do not need a level, so we use the current block context -# to try and find and validate the current printk. In summary the current -# printk includes all preceding printk's which have no newline on the end. -# we assume the first bad printk is the one to report. - if ($line =~ /\bprintk\((?!KERN_)\s*"/) { - my $ok = 0; - for (my $ln = $linenr - 1; $ln >= $first_line; $ln--) { - #print "CHECK<$lines[$ln - 1]\n"; - # we have a preceding printk if it ends - # with "\n" ignore it, else it is to blame - if ($lines[$ln - 1] =~ m{\bprintk\(}) { - if ($rawlines[$ln - 1] !~ m{\\n"}) { - $ok = 1; - } - last; - } - } - if ($ok == 0) { - WARN("PRINTK_WITHOUT_KERN_LEVEL", - "printk() should include KERN_ facility level\n" . $herecurr); - } +# printk should use KERN_* levels + if ($line =~ /\bprintk\s*\(\s*(?!KERN_[A-Z]+\b)/) { + WARN("PRINTK_WITHOUT_KERN_LEVEL", + "printk() should include KERN_ facility level\n" . $herecurr); } if ($line =~ /\bprintk\s*\(\s*KERN_([A-Z]+)/) { _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from joe@perches.com are spellingtxt-add-unnecessary-typo-variants.patch parse-maintainers-add-ability-to-specify-filenames.patch checkpatch-printks-always-need-a-kern_level.patch