All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Simon Gaiser <simon@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Resume from suspend to RAM broken when using early microcode updates
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 06:11:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ACE177902000078001BA47D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8da2a1f-b2e8-f8c3-4e33-bc84ac0cc7d4@invisiblethingslab.com>

>>> On 11.04.18 at 14:01, <simon@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote:
> Andrew Cooper:
>> On 11/04/18 12:48, Simon Gaiser wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> when I use early microcode loading with the microcode update with the
>>> BTI mitigations, resuming from suspend to RAM is broken.
>>>
>>> Based on added logging to enter_state() (from power.c) it doesn't
>>> survive the local_irq_restore(flags) call (at least a printk() after the
>>> call doesn't output anything on the serial console).
>>>
>>> I guess that some irq handler tries to use IBRS/IBPB. But the microcode
>>> is only loaded later.
>>>
>>> If I simply move the microcode_resume_cpu(0) directly before the
>>> local_irq_restore(flags) everything seems to work fine. But I'm not sure
>>> if this has unintended consequences.
>>>
>>> I tested the above with Xen 4.8.3 from Qubes which includes the BTI and
>>> microcode patches from staging-4.8. AFAICS there are no commits which
>>> changes the affected code or other commits which sound relevant so this
>>> probably affected also all the newer branches.
>> 
>> S3 support is a very unloved area of the hypervisor.
>> 
>> Yes - we definitely need to get microcode reloaded before interrupts are
>> enabled.
> 
> Do you see any problems with simply moving microcode_resume_cpu(0)
> directly before the local_irq_restore(flags) call? (I'm not familiar
> with the code at all and (early) resume handling sounds like something
> which is easy to break in non obvious ways)

Yes, there would be a problem: microcode_resume_cpu()
spin_lock()-s almost first thing, and this would break our
(simplistic) lock checking. Putting it also ahead of
spin_debug_enable() should work otoh.

Once at it, cpufreq_add_cpu() should be moved ahead of the
enable_cpu label as well, as cpufreq_del_cpu() wasn't called
yet at the point of the only goto to that label.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-11 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-11 11:48 Resume from suspend to RAM broken when using early microcode updates Simon Gaiser
2018-04-11 11:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-04-11 12:01   ` Simon Gaiser
2018-04-11 12:11     ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2018-04-11 12:17       ` Jan Beulich
2018-04-11 12:46         ` Simon Gaiser
2018-04-11 13:45           ` Jan Beulich
2018-04-11 20:14             ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/microcode: Indicate "not found" in rc of microcode_resume_cpu() Simon Gaiser
2018-04-11 20:14               ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: correct ordering of operations during S3 resume Simon Gaiser
2018-04-11 20:21                 ` [PATCH v2 " Simon Gaiser
     [not found]                   ` <5ACE6EA10200005203786DDD@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
2018-04-12  7:12                     ` Jan Beulich
2018-04-12  6:56               ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/microcode: Indicate "not found" in rc of microcode_resume_cpu() Jan Beulich
2018-04-11 12:12     ` Resume from suspend to RAM broken when using early microcode updates Andrew Cooper
2018-04-11 14:49       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-11 15:05         ` Andrew Cooper
2018-04-11 15:32           ` Jan Beulich
2018-04-11 12:04   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ACE177902000078001BA47D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=simon@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.