All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: kvm_dist_get/put: skip the registers banked by GICR
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 17:20:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B0683FB.4000602@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acca5b80-f527-bc39-0b63-147e53affb4b@redhat.com>



On 2018/5/24 17:04, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Shannon,
> 
> On 05/23/2018 05:53 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> While we skip the GIC_INTERNAL irqs, we don't change the register offset
>> accordingly. This will overlap the GICR registers value and leave the
>> last GIC_INTERNAL irq's registers out of update.
>>
>> Fix this by skipping the registers banked by GICR.
>>
>> Also for migration compatibility if the migration source (old version
>> qemu) doesn't send gicd_no_shift_bug = 1 to destination, then we shift
>> the data of PPI to get the right data for SPI.
>>
>> Fixes: 367b9f527becdd20ddf116e17a3c0c2bbc486920
>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V3: add migration compatibility and fix code style
>> ---
>>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c         | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c            | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h |  1 +
>>  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
>> index 7b54d52..f93e5d2 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
>> @@ -141,6 +141,38 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu = {
>>      }
>>  };
>>  
>> +static int gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug_pre_load(void *opaque)
>> +{
>> +    GICv3State *cs = opaque;
>> +
>> +   /*
>> +    * If the gicd_no_shift_bug subsection is not transferred this
>> +    * means gicd_no_shift_bug is 0x0 (which might not be the same as
>> +    * our reset value).
>> +    */
>> +    cs->gicd_no_shift_bug = 0x0;
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug_needed(void *opaque)
>> +{
>> +    GICv3State *cs = opaque;
>> +
>> +    return cs->gicd_no_shift_bug;
>> +}
>> +
>> +const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug = {
>> +    .name = "arm_gicv3/gicd_no_shift_bug",
>> +    .version_id = 1,
>> +    .minimum_version_id = 1,
>> +    .pre_load = gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug_pre_load,
>> +    .needed = gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug_needed,
>> +    .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
>> +        VMSTATE_BOOL(gicd_no_shift_bug, GICv3State),
>> +        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
>> +    }
>> +};
>> +
>>  static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
>>      .name = "arm_gicv3",
>>      .version_id = 1,
>> @@ -165,6 +197,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
>>          VMSTATE_STRUCT_VARRAY_POINTER_UINT32(cpu, GICv3State, num_cpu,
>>                                               vmstate_gicv3_cpu, GICv3CPUState),
>>          VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
>> +    },
>> +    .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * []) {
>> +        &vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug,
>> +        NULL
>>      }
>>  };
>>  
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
>> index 3536795..bd961f1 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
>> @@ -136,6 +136,12 @@ static void kvm_dist_get_priority(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset, uint8_t *bmp)
>>      int irq;
>>  
>>      field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
>> +    /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 8
>> +     * GICD_IPRIORITYR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
>> +     * functionality is replaced by GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>. So it doesn't need to
>> +     * sync them.
>> +     */
>> +    offset += (8 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> Now I am unclear about the semantics of the s->gicd_ipriority & friends.
> With that change, is it supposed to contain only the states of SPIs or
> contain the RAZ states of PPI/SGIs + states of SPIs. The array is
> dimensionned to contain states for PPI/SGI+SPIs, right? In other words,
> shouldn't we also shift field?
> 
Yes, it should also shift the field. But not sure if this will affect
the new to old migration scenario. Let me think about this.

> Thanks
> 
> Eric
>>      for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 8) {
>>          kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, &reg, false);
>>          *field = reg;
>> @@ -149,7 +155,18 @@ static void kvm_dist_put_priority(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset, uint8_t *bmp)
>>      uint32_t reg, *field;
>>      int irq;
>>  
>> -    field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
>> +    if (!s->gicd_no_shift_bug) {
>> +        field = (uint32_t *)(bmp + 8 * sizeof(uint32_t));
>> +    } else {
>> +        field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 8
>> +     * GICD_IPRIORITYR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
>> +     * functionality is replaced by GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>. So it doesn't need to
>> +     * sync them.
>> +     */
>> +    offset += (8 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> in the old to new migration scenario, IIUC,
> bmp contains state of 32 internal PPI/SGI(RAZ) + s->num_irq-32 SPIs
> Here aren't you "putting" the RAZ state of the 32 PPI/SGIs into the
> first 32 SPIs here?
> 
Please see above code, this new version patch I add a flag for migration
compat suggested as Peter. If it migrates from old qemu, the
gicd_no_shift_bug will be 0, then it will shift the bmp, while that will
drop the data of PPI/SGI and also the last 32 SPIs info will be empty.
None of current machines use last 32 SPIs, so it's fine for the moment.

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-24  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-23  3:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 1/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: increase clroffset accordingly Shannon Zhao
2018-05-23  3:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: kvm_dist_get/put: skip the registers banked by GICR Shannon Zhao
2018-05-24  9:04   ` Auger Eric
2018-05-24  9:20     ` Shannon Zhao [this message]
2018-05-24 12:10       ` Auger Eric
2018-05-24 13:14     ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 13:59       ` Auger Eric
2018-05-24 14:16         ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 14:40           ` Auger Eric
2018-05-24 14:56             ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 14:58               ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 15:09               ` Auger Eric
2018-05-25  8:42               ` Shannon Zhao
2018-05-25  9:00                 ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 13:11   ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-25  9:15     ` Shannon Zhao
2018-05-24 12:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 1/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: increase clroffset accordingly Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5B0683FB.4000602@huawei.com \
    --to=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.