All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Ping: [PATCH RFC] x86/HVM: also stuff RSB upon exit to guest
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:28:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B766AF302000078001DF2F8@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5B5B2A3E02000078001D8810@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>

>>> On 27.07.18 at 16:20, <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> In order to mostly eliminate abuse of what Xen leaves in the RSB by
> guest level attackers, fill the RSB with almost-NULL pointers right
> before entering guest context.
> 
> The placement of the initialization code is intentional: If it was put
> in e.g. hvm_enable(), we'd have to be more careful wrt. changing the
> low L4 entry of the idle page tables (I didn't check whether boot time
> low mappings have disappeared by then), and get_random() couldn't be
> used either. Furthermore this way, if no HVM guest gets ever started,
> no setup would ever occur.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> ---
> TBD: In the end I'm not sure the (pseudo-)randomness is worth it.
>      Placing the stub uniformly at a fixed address would allow to get
>      rid of the variable, slightly streamlining the call sites.
> TBD: Obviously using NULL here has the downside of reads through NULL
>      not going to fault anymore.
> 
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,10 @@ integer_param("hvm_debug", opt_hvm_debug
>  
>  struct hvm_function_table hvm_funcs __read_mostly;
>  
> +extern void do_overwrite_rsb(void);
> +extern const char do_overwrite_rsb_end[];
> +void (* __read_mostly hvm_overwrite_rsb)(void) = do_overwrite_rsb;
> +
>  /*
>   * The I/O permission bitmap is globally shared by all HVM guests except
>   * the hardware domain which needs a more permissive one.
> @@ -583,6 +587,49 @@ int hvm_domain_initialise(struct domain
>          return -EINVAL;
>      }
>  
> +    if ( boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_HVM) &&
> +         unlikely((unsigned long)hvm_overwrite_rsb >= PAGE_SIZE) )
> +    {
> +        /*
> +         * Map an RSB stuffing routine at a random, 16-byte aligned address
> +         * in the first linear page, to allow filling the RSB with 
> almost-NULL
> +         * pointers before entering HVM guest context.  This builds on the
> +         * assumption that no sane OS will place anything there which could 
> be
> +         * abused as an exploit gadget.
> +         */
> +        unsigned long addr = (get_random() << 4) & ~PAGE_MASK;
> +        unsigned int size = do_overwrite_rsb_end -
> +                            (const char *)do_overwrite_rsb;
> +        struct page_info *pg = alloc_domheap_page(NULL, 0);
> +        void *ptr;
> +
> +        if ( !pg ||
> +             map_pages_to_xen(0, page_to_mfn(pg), 1, PAGE_HYPERVISOR_RX) )
> +        {
> +            if ( pg )
> +                free_domheap_page(pg);
> +            return -ENOMEM;
> +        }
> +
> +        /*
> +         * Avoid NULL itself, so that branches there will hit the all-ones
> +         * pattern installed below.
> +         */
> +        if ( !addr )
> +            addr = 0x10;
> +        while ( addr + size > PAGE_SIZE )
> +            addr -= 0x10;
> +
> +        ptr = __map_domain_page(pg);
> +        memset(ptr, -1, PAGE_SIZE);
> +        memcpy(ptr + addr, do_overwrite_rsb, size);
> +        unmap_domain_page(ptr);
> +
> +        smp_wmb();
> +        hvm_overwrite_rsb = (void *)addr;
> +        printk(XENLOG_INFO "RSB stuffing stub at %p\n", hvm_overwrite_rsb);
> +    }
> +
>      spin_lock_init(&d->arch.hvm_domain.irq_lock);
>      spin_lock_init(&d->arch.hvm_domain.uc_lock);
>      spin_lock_init(&d->arch.hvm_domain.write_map.lock);
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> @@ -1661,6 +1661,10 @@ void init_xen_l4_slots(l4_pgentry_t *l4t
>                 (ROOT_PAGETABLE_FIRST_XEN_SLOT + slots -
>                  l4_table_offset(XEN_VIRT_START)) * sizeof(*l4t));
>      }
> +
> +    /* Make sure the RSB stuffing stub is accessible. */
> +    if ( is_hvm_domain(d) )
> +        l4t[0] = idle_pg_table[0];
>  }
>  
>  bool fill_ro_mpt(mfn_t mfn)
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
> @@ -552,6 +552,13 @@ ENTRY(dom_crash_sync_extable)
>          jmp   asm_domain_crash_synchronous /* Does not return */
>          .popsection
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HVM
> +ENTRY(do_overwrite_rsb)
> +        DO_OVERWRITE_RSB tmp=rdx
> +        ret
> +GLOBAL(do_overwrite_rsb_end)
> +#endif
> +
>          .section .text.entry, "ax", @progbits
>  
>  ENTRY(common_interrupt)
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/spec_ctrl_asm.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/spec_ctrl_asm.h
> @@ -249,6 +249,8 @@
>  
>  /* Use when exiting to HVM guest context. */
>  #define SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_HVM                                           \
> +    mov hvm_overwrite_rsb(%rip), %rcx;                                  \
> +    ALTERNATIVE "", "INDIRECT_CALL %rcx", X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_HVM;       \
>      ALTERNATIVE "",                                                     \
>          DO_SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_GUEST, X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_HVM
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org 
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel 




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-17  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-27 14:20 [PATCH RFC] x86/HVM: also stuff RSB upon exit to guest Jan Beulich
2018-08-17  6:28 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2018-08-29  7:08 ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2018-09-03 16:20 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-09-04  7:37   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5B766AF302000078001DF2F8@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.