Re: [review-request] 5921 "Task outcomes are sorted by database value, instead of alphabetically"

["Reyna, David" <david.reyna@windriver.com>]

> This seems to be working for the Outcome column. Does it also solve the
> problem for the "Cache attempt" one?

Yes! That is the "sstate_cache" value.

- David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barros Pena, Belen [mailto:belen.barros.pena@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 8:14 AM
> To: Reyna, David; DAMIAN, ALEXANDRU
> Cc: toaster@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [review-request] 5921 "Task outcomes are sorted by database
> value, instead of alphabetically"
> 
> On 11/04/2014 05:56, "Reyna, David" <david.reyna@windriver.com> wrote:
> 
> >Hi Belén and Alex,
> >
> >I have completed 5921, using the technique of a python class Œproperty¹
> >as a Œfield¹ together with an explicit python sort (instead of Œsortby¹),
> >as described in this web site. This general method can be used for any
> >transient or synthesized value of a
> > class instance.
> >
> >
> >http://blog.mattwoodward.com/2013/02/generating-and-sorting-on-transient.h
> >tml
> ><http://blog.mattwoodward.com/2013/02/generating-and-sorting-on-transient.
> >html>
> >
> >The branch is here: dreyna/outcome_sort_5921
> 
> This seems to be working for the Outcome column. Does it also solve the
> problem for the "Cache attempt" one?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Belén
> 
> >
> >This patch handles both forward and reverse sorts, plus it handles the
> >Œ-1¹ base for the outcome text table and the convention of using a blank
> >string for sstate_cache values of SSTATE_NA. The regular column sorts
> >pass the regression test. I also ran the
> > HTML Validator.
> >
> >- David
> >
> >
>