From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:42:51 +0800
Subject: [LTP] LTP release
In-Reply-To: <20200923092932.GB12109@dell5510>
References: <20200908073138.GB2475@yuki.lan> <20200922182102.GB12980@yuki.lan>
 <CAEemH2dFqYRNNSyhQ1bJ_L+wHFUQkOVBgdnm-_6Nqr4rP7UbBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEemH2cxf2RQz5psmsaUsBHRrtayLJUVTfCo+NvevSyu7bLmvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200923092932.GB12109@dell5510>
Message-ID: <5F6B189B.5010600@cn.fujitsu.com>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

? 2020/9/23 17:29, Petr Vorel ??:
> Hi Li,
>
>> CC' people who touched the patches maybe give a hand.
> +1
>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:50 PM Li Wang<liwang@redhat.com>  wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:20 AM Cyril Hrubis<chrubis@suse.cz>  wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>> As far as I can tell I've pushed the last patch that should have been in
>>>> the release just now. With that we should have a week worth of
>>>> pre-release testing since we are aiming for a release at the end of the
>>>> September. If you haven't tried LTP git HEAD yet, please do so now and
>>>> report any problems you find.
>
>>> We still got this persistent fail on some kernels(RHEL8, kernel-v5.9-rc4):
>>> ---
>>> send02.c:86: FAIL: recv() error: EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK (11)
>>> send02.c:86: FAIL: recv() error: EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK (11)
>>> send02.c:86: FAIL: recv() error: EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK (11)
>>> send02.c:86: FAIL: recv() error: EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK (11)
> This is working on openSUSE kernel 5.9.0-rc3. I haven't checked whether there
> are some special patches or whether there is a regression in rc4.
>
>>> ---
>>> fanotify10.c:404: TFAIL: group 0 (4) got event: mask 1020 (expected 1000)
>>> pid=95067 fd=12
>>> fanotify10.c:404: TFAIL: group 1 (4) got event: mask 1020 (expected 1000)
>>> pid=95067 fd=12
>>> fanotify10.c:404: TFAIL: group 2 (4) got event: mask 1020 (expected 1000)
>>> pid=95067 fd=12
>>> fanotify10.c:404: TFAIL: group 0 (0) got event: mask 1020 (expected 1000)
>>> pid=95067 fd=12
>>> fanotify10.c:404: TFAIL: group 1 (0) got event: mask 1020 (expected 1000)
>>> pid=95067 fd=12
>>> fanotify10.c:404: TFAIL: group 2 (0) got event: mask 1020 (expected 1000)
>>> pid=95067 fd=12
> Again, working on openSUSE kernel 5.9.0-rc3.
>
>>> ---
>>> recvmmsg01.c:86:9: error: request for member ?type? in something not a
>>> structure or union
>>>    timeout.type = tv->ts_type;
> Yes, 135af8ededd4d74d32f3322801fbab1f732a259a added in recvmmsg01 broke build:
> https://travis-ci.org/github/linux-test-project/ltp/builds/729394877
> (this build is for sendto03 - next commit, but that's ok)
>
> Having a look into it.
Hi Petr, Li

I sent a patch to fix the compiler error after a quick look:
http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2020-September/019060.html

Thanks,
Xiao Yang
>>> Otherwise, the latest LTP test good from my side(RHEL8, mainline-kernel).
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>