From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/16] Introduce the BFQ I/O scheduler To: Paolo Valente References: <20170412162322.11139-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <62E939C2-CBA8-4D33-AEEF-380616616E52@linaro.org> <9270aa70-a40a-68b1-c93c-5229014abb39@kernel.dk> Cc: Tejun Heo , Fabio Checconi , Arianna Avanzini , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Linux-Kernal , Ulf Hansson , Linus Walleij , broonie@kernel.org From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <5a0d1cd7-dbeb-be2e-e966-e4e661408132@kernel.dk> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:34:12 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-ID: On 04/19/2017 01:05 PM, Paolo Valente wrote: > >> Il giorno 19 apr 2017, alle ore 16:33, Jens Axboe ha scritto: >> >> On 04/19/2017 03:23 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: >>> >>>> Il giorno 12 apr 2017, alle ore 18:23, Paolo Valente ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> new patch series, addressing (both) issues raised by Bart [1], and >>>> with block/Makefile fixed as suggested by Bart [2]. >>>> >>> >>> Hi Jens, >>> apparently no complain of any sort on this last series. Do you think >>> we could make it for 4.12, or shall we aim at 4.13? >> >> We may as well queue it up now, I don't think there's much point in >> deferring an extra cycle. >> > > A little scary, but (of course) fine for me. Reaching the culmination of having your big project merged after a long time is always a little scary. For now, kick back and open a Tignanello, and brace yourself for tending to potential bug reports once the 4.12 merge window opens. -- Jens Axboe