From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91280C433F5 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237649AbhLQOz6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:55:58 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:58390 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237641AbhLQOz5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:55:57 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86CB1435; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.83.65] (unknown [10.57.83.65]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A42063F774; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:55:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ae9ef1d-76bb-6ff3-fa34-27e9399f0110@arm.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:55:52 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] perf test: Shell - Limit to only run executable scripts in tests To: carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, mike.leach@linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org, inux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org References: <20211215160403.69264-1-carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> From: Suzuki K Poulose In-Reply-To: <20211215160403.69264-1-carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15/12/2021 16:03, carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com wrote: > From: Carsten Haitzler > > Perf test's shell runner will just run everything in the tests > directory (as long as it's not another directory or does not begin > with a dot), but sometimes you find files in there that are not shell > scripts - perf.data output for example if you do some testing and then > the next time you run perf test it tries to run these. Check the files > are executable so they are actually intended to be test scripts and > not just some "random junk" files there. > > Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler > --- > tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 4 +++- > tools/perf/util/path.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > tools/perf/util/path.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c > index 8cb5a1c3489e..ece272b55587 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c > @@ -295,7 +295,9 @@ static const char *shell_test__description(char *description, size_t size, > > #define for_each_shell_test(entlist, nr, base, ent) \ > for (int __i = 0; __i < nr && (ent = entlist[__i]); __i++) \ > - if (!is_directory(base, ent) && ent->d_name[0] != '.') > + if (!is_directory(base, ent) && \ > + is_executable_file(base, ent) && \ > + ent->d_name[0] != '.') If we reorder the checks, we could potentially avoid a few syscalls for hidden items. i.e., if we do ent->d_name[0] != '.' first. > > static const char *shell_tests__dir(char *path, size_t size) > { > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/path.c b/tools/perf/util/path.c > index caed0336429f..7dde8c230ae8 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/path.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/path.c > @@ -92,3 +92,15 @@ bool is_directory(const char *base_path, const struct dirent *dent) > > return S_ISDIR(st.st_mode); > } > + > +bool is_executable_file(const char *base_path, const struct dirent *dent) > +{ > + char path[PATH_MAX]; > + struct stat st; > + > + sprintf(path, "%s/%s", base_path, dent->d_name); Should this be snprintf() for additional safety ? > + if (stat(path, &st)) > + return false; > + > + return !S_ISDIR(st.st_mode) && (st.st_mode & S_IXUSR); Otherwise looks good to me. Suzuki