From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [regression] agp/intel: Sandybridge doesnt require GMCH enabling Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:31:45 +0000 Message-ID: <5b55a1$ih5i18@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com> References: <1288520958.5299.4.camel@zwerg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1D89E738 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:31:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1288520958.5299.4.camel@zwerg> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Alexey Fisher , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:29:18 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote: > after commit e380f60b22eddec7825224b8d788572c82b63161 > intel driver filed to load, so system fallback to vesa driver. *grin* I'm looking right now at how many systems we were poking bits in registers that were undefined. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre