From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Roese Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 10:58:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm: mvebu: armada-370-xp.dtsi: add u-boot,dm-pre-reloc to spi0 In-Reply-To: <3C150482-1E34-43C3-AC04-F7FB6989B488@easyb.ch> References: <20200503200039.11816-1-ezra@easyb.ch> <62A66494-31C8-4623-80A0-83C7D6050FD7@easyb.ch> <3C150482-1E34-43C3-AC04-F7FB6989B488@easyb.ch> Message-ID: <5b84fa45-c2f6-ff32-35f9-fb874e96f5b6@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Ezra, On 05.05.20 09:10, Ezra Buehler wrote: > On 5 May 2020, at 08:45, Stefan Roese wrote: >> U-Boot specific DT properties, like "u-boot,dm-pre-reloc" should be >> added in U-Boot specific DT dtsi files > > OK, that makes sense. However, in your commit 1718a9f3b7 (arm: mvebu: > armada-370-xp.dtsi: Add "u-boot, dm-pre-reloc" to "internal-regs") you > wrote: > > I'm not adding this property in an *u-boot.dtsi file, since there is > none matching the generic rules for all files including this dtsi > file. So to not miss any of the boards using this dtsi file, I'm > adding it to this file directly, which makes the Linux merge a less > easy unforunately. > > > So, do you want me to try this now? Hmmm, I can't remember the exact details. Thanks for the reference. But perhaps there is a matching *-u-boot.dtsi rule / pattern that can be used to include such a newly introduced file. I would very much welcome it, when you would investigate here. Thanks, Stefan