From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: initialize SVM spinlock Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:40:56 +0100 Message-ID: <5c7709fd-6c56-d53a-afa3-83ae56499281@redhat.com> References: <20170122090453.88101-1-dvyukov@google.com> <99e8c203-a6fa-bdd4-9cec-58d65777a06c@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Hildenbrand , joro@8bytes.org, =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , KVM list , syzkaller To: Dmitry Vyukov Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33908 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbdAXLlA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 06:41:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 24/01/2017 12:34, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 23/01/2017 15:52, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> >>> @@ -1382,6 +1383,9 @@ static void avic_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm) >>> unsigned long flags; >>> struct kvm_arch *vm_data = &kvm->arch; >>> >>> + if (!avic) >>> + return 0; >>> + >>> avic_free_vm_id(vm_data->avic_vm_id); >>> >>> if (vm_data->avic_logical_id_table_page) >> >> Yes, this is the right one. > > > I can mail this patch, but I can only test build. No problem, I have applied it locally and I am testing it. Paolo