On 07/19/2017 12:08 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>> We need that on posterior patches.
> 
> following/subsequent/later is probably a better word.

I'd go with 'later'.

Also, s/incomming/incoming/ in the subject

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org