From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03CEC3F2D1 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C544124654 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="uwe7YH1J" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728361AbgCDR5o (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:57:44 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f65.google.com ([209.85.216.65]:53266 "EHLO mail-pj1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728168AbgCDR5o (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:57:44 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f65.google.com with SMTP id cx7so1222531pjb.3 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:57:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:from:to:cc:subject:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=i1lMZOf+CrLPEvaqZThM8hJp5ddcaH/vaT+qmLLqSX0=; b=uwe7YH1J3h7ta7EWvPMU0OuKh1vXynscEYCmmzWSVL+gFTrEQ1cVKd7qwo9iuxjDs6 LxukAYOZ5sZ5g7GnsxW/HAdnuspknGqDmKAVGN0eqpZ3xsIuRs9v+T/VQdttCoNEMFLd IOnx51Oeu102t6vJFJGOlwdBNM6DuUy131zOPbOAuFNIQZ+1jVRWWn+lwK1ds0dxo9fn SPpLvrqjufa5eRv4HT5GB79ygy/6OkIGmQ+ct7owpRPh+z+eLaqCba41XAOlvdiPC8Xm 6e9uNxXFbF0jxE8Dfj1dmrNOoHUtjiYc8zFjpMEKh8BWuTdDMXrCYVcpr1TL3GXFPPgo 5G1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:to:cc:subject:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=i1lMZOf+CrLPEvaqZThM8hJp5ddcaH/vaT+qmLLqSX0=; b=FLTBTyWWNsAGY9s+QfKVZVduq73hbAtR4FXDqM+2MHUXiTSbv/PhnADWBVVWABgIdi gltgJhYKVmkhP79WWgAbZuTMQB4ob8XzE8xiDbw2GEV0IBn+7QoEBd9ceK6FVehRD3HB 8Zoh7JLJGWNmfwMINIBpDvCite7KbVXzxQ/2qEihVj8xESzNlYXL6Dj0poeajWMi/ePv KJvMSganB7d5C9JWgtX4oVGWz5iJDD4woRHJkEyprms5t6Uddt3Zy4+yIJ6zekooHjzs HXz5fuGTGzItUpUg3Fcgzhe14NBZnytuJeUrFpvaauGYN9onKC5aI3wVqzpxQvr14YnY tkSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0SPgL0rFhmlPjx+1MBAFAqaTQNhp1+NFncEJP8jjVoLNeICZQx j17JhEqaoe0bvvb+S9lol2sKLpyko6k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv11654DysSQVeNU70sKnYWokrKJ0TQqRGIdfPtzsXfPFRucED2tIMcWa13JMBzRDqUVp2ZSg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8647:: with SMTP id y7mr4066815plt.224.1583344662751; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:57:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from SARKAR ([43.224.157.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x65sm30560835pfb.171.2020.03.04.09.57.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:57:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5e5fec16.1c69fb81.b144.0870@mx.google.com> X-Google-Original-Message-ID: <20200304175737.GA12716@rohitsarkar5398@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 23:27:37 +0530 From: Rohit Sarkar To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: dragos.bogdan@analog.com, JManeyrol@invensense.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GSOC][RFC] Proposal References: <5e55473d.1c69fb81.82355.928d@mx.google.com> <5e581673.1c69fb81.9fd7b.25c2@mx.google.com> <20200301143418.438ce7f9@archlinux> <5e5c9393.1c69fb81.18044.9bc8@mx.google.com> <20200303202950.1bc0dfc5@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200303202950.1bc0dfc5@archlinux> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 08:29:50PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:33:09 +0530 > Rohit Sarkar wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 02:34:18PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:50:15 +0530 > > > Rohit Sarkar wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 09:41:37PM +0530, Rohit Sarkar wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > I am proposing to work on the accelerometer MPU6050 as my primary > > > > > project for the summer. The work items are outlined in [1] thanks to > > > > > Jean. > > > > > If time permits (which it should), I will be picking up other tasks > > > > > outlined in [2] by Jonathan and Alexandru. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would like to hear people's views on this. > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=158257639113000&w=2 > > > > > [2]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=158261515624212&w=2 > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Rohit > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > would love some feedback on this. > > > > There are no proposals as such on the GSOC IIO page [1]. > > > > Was wondering if there is any new iio driver that can be made into a > > > > gsoc project. > > > > > > Hi Rohit, > > > > > > A couple of questions. Do you have a gsoc mentor lined up? > > > > On the GSOC IIO page (https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/gsoc/2020-gsoc-iio-driver) > > Dragos has been listed as a mentor. Haven't really heard back from him > > yet. > > I would definitely be looking to discuss this with Dragos. > > > > You should discuss a proposal with whoever that is. > > > > > > My gut feeling is that the features suggested by Jean-Baptisite > > > do not form a particularly good focus for the body of a gsoc project. > > > There are too many rather disassociated items, without a connected > > > 'story'. > > > > > > They are good items for getting familiar with the subsystem and > > > a particular driver but for the actual project you probably want > > > something that is more 'yours' in the sense that you drive it from > > > initial prototypes through to final upstream code. > > > > > > Previous projects have (I think) mostly centred on support for a new > > > driver. > > > > Makes sense. Is there any new driver that needs to be added though? And > > if not what else can qualify as a project? > > There might be something, but that sort of project is much harder > to structure than a clear implement something. > > There are always new devices that don't have drivers that someone > is interested in supporting. The main requirement is to find > find something that the mentor things is the right balance of > complex and not too complex to support. > > The link you have above suggests Dragos was thinking of an Analog > devices part (which makes sense given his day job ;) > > You are still fairly early (which is great) so it may well be that > Dragos hasn't yet spun up for this round. > > Jonathan Thanks for getting back! I have indeed reached out to Dragos and it seems the IIO GSOC page has been updated since this mail chain was started. Hijacking this mail thread for another question I had: The page mentions that the recommended hardware is a Raspberry pi model 3 B+, I recently got a RPi 4 model B to facilitate my development in the iio subsystem, will that be fine? > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Rohit > Thanks, Rohit