On 3/23/19 1:32 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
Hi,

is there a reason for not including
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/159465/
?

Why would I reference patchwork? How does that work if this is the only message sent out?

It says sumo-next on patchwork, but I don't know which sumo-next it is, I don't see it in:
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/log/?h=sumo-next
I don't have write access to core.

the changes are in contrib: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/sumo-next
- armin

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 3:12 AM Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote:
Please consider this for the next sumo update

The following changes since commit 6d56e912fbbaa22830b4da5ab230586a3d15b23e:

  package_rpm/archiver: Apply bandaid to src.rpm creation (2019-02-25 22:13:08 +0000)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib stable/sumo-next
  http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/sumo-next

Chen Qi (2):
  systemd: fix CVE-2018-15686
  systemd: fix CVE-2018-15688

George McCollister (5):
  systemd: fix CVE-2018-15687
  systemd: Security fix CVE-2018-16864
  systemd: Security fix CVE-2018-16865
  systemd: fix CVE-2018-6954
  systemd: fix CVE-2019-6454

Marcus Cooper (1):
  systemd: Security fix CVE-2018-16866

Mingli Yu (1):
  logrotate.py: restore /etc/logrotate.d/wtmp

ROGEZ Matthieu (1):
  systemd: Fix typo in root home variable.

Richard Purdie (1):
  oeqa/runtime/dnf: Fix test error when static libs are enabled

Stefan Agner (1):
  run-postinsts: for dpkg/opkg, do not rely on /etc/*-postinsts

 meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/dnf.py                 |    2 +-
 meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/logrotate.py           |    6 +-
 ...sive-let-s-rework-the-recursive-logic-to-.patch |  252 +++
 ...eserializing-state-always-use-read_line-L.patch |  250 +++
 ...sure-we-have-enough-space-for-the-DHCP6-o.patch |   39 +
 ...n-t-resolve-pathnames-when-traversing-rec.patch |  643 +++++++
 .../systemd/systemd/0002-Make-tmpfiles-safe.patch  | 1828 ++++++++++++++++++++
 ...-not-store-the-iovec-entry-for-process-co.patch |  193 +++
 ...ld-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-1k.patch |   60 +
 ...ote-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-i.patch |   79 +
 ...nal-fix-out-of-bounds-read-CVE-2018-16866.patch |   49 +
 .../systemd/systemd/CVE-2019-6454.patch            |  210 +++
 ...e-receive-an-invalid-dbus-message-ignore-.patch |   61 +
 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_237.bb           |   13 +-
 .../run-postinsts/run-postinsts/run-postinsts      |   21 +-
 .../run-postinsts/run-postinsts.service            |    1 -
 16 files changed, 3694 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-chown-recursive-let-s-rework-the-recursive-logic-to-.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-core-when-deserializing-state-always-use-read_line-L.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-dhcp6-make-sure-we-have-enough-space-for-the-DHCP6-o.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-tmpfiles-don-t-resolve-pathnames-when-traversing-rec.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0002-Make-tmpfiles-safe.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0024-journald-do-not-store-the-iovec-entry-for-process-co.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0025-journald-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-1k.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0026-journal-remote-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-i.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0027-journal-fix-out-of-bounds-read-CVE-2018-16866.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/CVE-2019-6454.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/sd-bus-if-we-receive-an-invalid-dbus-message-ignore-.patch

--
2.7.4

--
_______________________________________________
bitbake-devel mailing list
bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-devel