From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28170C54E8D for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 14:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123D1206F5 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 14:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730318AbgELON3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 10:13:29 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36154 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730303AbgELON0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 10:13:26 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C80BAD7D for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 14:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 90D7ADA70B; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:12:34 +0200 (CEST) From: David Sterba To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Pending bugs for 5.7 Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 16:12:34 +0200 Message-Id: <5e955017351005f2cc4c0210f401935203de8496c56cb76f53547d435f502803.dsterba@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Hi, there are some pending bugs that are either regressions or exposed after changes in the 5.7 development cycle. At least the root leaks need to be fixed, so patches with features are lower priority in case you wonder why yours hasn't been merged or reviewed. I'll post each as reply to this mail as they contain dumps of logs. The short summary: * root leaks Recent updates switched from SRCU to refcounting and adde a tree root leak detector, that reports leak in tests btrfs/125. * corrupted leaf For this one it's not clear if it's a regression or an old bug, reported by test generic/457 * memory leaks With KMEMLEAK turned on, there are several reports that there are leaks. It's not clear if it's related to the root leaks. * lockdep warnings reproducible reports, our locks vs fs_reclaim, or just our locks