On 09/08/2018 19:43, speck for Andi Kleen wrote:
>> But that would only apply to processors with
>> MAXPHYADDR=52.
> We don't expect those to be vulnerable to L1TF.
> 
> So patches are not needed I think.

Looks like they are still needed on processors with cache-maxphyaddr =
l1tf-maxphyaddr.

Paolo