All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"Wanpeng Li" <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
	"Jag Raman" <jag.raman@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] KVM: VMX: Consider PID.PIR to determine if vCPU has pending interrupts
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:58:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee4c4ae-9d22-d560-bb61-e5f40b56da2e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <030dd147-8c4f-d6e3-85a8-ee743ce4d5b0@oracle.com>

On 11/11/19 15:59, Joao Martins wrote:
>> Should we check the bitmap only if SN is false?
                                            ^^^^^

Of course it should be skipped if SN is false, as you correctly say below.

>> We have a precondition
>> that if SN is clear then non-empty PIR implies ON=1 (modulo the small
>> window in vmx_vcpu_pi_load of course), so that'd be a bit faster.
> Makes sense;
> 
> The bitmap check was really meant for SN=1.
> 
> Should SN=0 we would be saving ~22-27 cycles as far as I micro-benchmarked a few
> weeks ago. Now that you suggest it, it would be also good for older platforms too.

Or even newer platforms if they don't use VT-d.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-11 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-06 17:55 [PATCH v1 0/3] KVM: VMX: Posted Interrupts fixes Joao Martins
2019-11-06 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] KVM: VMX: Consider PID.PIR to determine if vCPU has pending interrupts Joao Martins
2019-11-07 16:00   ` Jag Raman
2019-11-11 14:46   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-11 14:59     ` Joao Martins
2019-11-11 15:58       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-11-06 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] KVM: VMX: Do not change PID.NDST when loading a blocked vCPU Joao Martins
2019-11-06 21:54   ` Joao Martins
2019-11-11 14:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-11 14:48     ` Joao Martins
2019-11-11 14:50       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-11 14:56         ` Joao Martins
2019-11-11 14:59           ` Liran Alon
2019-11-11 15:53             ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-11 17:27               ` Joao Martins
2019-11-06 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] KVM: VMX: Introduce pi_is_pir_empty() helper Joao Martins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ee4c4ae-9d22-d560-bb61-e5f40b56da2e@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=jag.raman@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.