From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAC5C3815B for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942FF2064A for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1416161AbgDOQfK (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:35:10 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:49794 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1416090AbgDOQfG (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:35:06 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725901FB; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.37.9.9] (unknown [10.37.9.9]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 430EC3F6C4; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: add the time namespace support To: Andrei Vagin Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Safonov References: <20200225073731.465270-1-avagin@gmail.com> <1c1ab662-5475-9d8b-038b-8411b060202a@arm.com> <1d9c4c56-af16-e54f-08ca-76c6570b2d53@arm.com> From: Vincenzo Frascino Message-ID: <5f60bff9-0fe1-7f1f-2dcc-2a7363801897@arm.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:35:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrei, On 4/15/20 5:14 PM, Andrei Vagin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:02 AM Vincenzo Frascino > wrote: >> >> Hi Andrei, >> >> On 4/11/20 8:33 AM, Andrei Vagin wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:23 AM Vincenzo Frascino >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have though a question on something I encountered during the testing of the >>>> patches: I noticed that all the tests related to CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM fail on >>>> arm64 (please find the results below the scissors). Is this expected? >>> >>> static int alarm_clock_get_timespec(clockid_t which_clock, struct >>> timespec64 *tp) >>> { >>> struct alarm_base *base = &alarm_bases[clock2alarm(which_clock)]; >>> >>> if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev()) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> It is probably that you get EINVAL from here ^^^. I will send a >>> separate patch to handle this case in tests properly. >>> >> >> This makes sense :) Please let me know when you post the fix so I can test it again. > > I have sent this fix: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/15/72 > That's good, I will try it by the end of this week or beginning of next and let you know the results. >> >> Are you planning as well to rebase this set?> > What is the right tree to rebase on? > I guess master, I was asking because it would make easier my testing :) > Thanks, > Andrei > -- Regards, Vincenzo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9D0C2BB85 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6558E206F9 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="sDwyio/4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6558E206F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description :Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=TE7bX+P6VmH+EdCW5XnGZUgFL1slzCzOkRqDVAbdSVU=; b=sDwyio/4P8Iult aztdzPprtESsbwH8fPhX+5ZJyt5ypU4qOjnJuEhPBMR7y60lJcprZlDJ9b8qMcxf6l3Hiuq0E90Ij At1dzeqWU9eDpuka6PWeKFJ4epNagODZYKVQFSL537nYeSxi4sj5uIwmJf0XKtDZ20yPB0pbB4w1z DACEVFrk9aoC7N30cvwRo2Gl5XbVunGZ5AvCU0rCNtPkwb3xpF2pVMIwJu9H6kahRgyg2QWub/L8e prbMQPidvkwhuWMcyH8VYowbfmoXAVHhGjrhzIM+Wn1oyF5/8mrqg3CjRuQzHTGHHpK67Ir02Ey/F 38/Y9sITyVogHlEhYfdg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOl0H-0003Lw-2F; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:35:09 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOl0C-0002XF-Oq for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:35:06 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725901FB; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.37.9.9] (unknown [10.37.9.9]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 430EC3F6C4; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: add the time namespace support To: Andrei Vagin References: <20200225073731.465270-1-avagin@gmail.com> <1c1ab662-5475-9d8b-038b-8411b060202a@arm.com> <1d9c4c56-af16-e54f-08ca-76c6570b2d53@arm.com> From: Vincenzo Frascino Message-ID: <5f60bff9-0fe1-7f1f-2dcc-2a7363801897@arm.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:35:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200415_093504_885393_B2273E42 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dmitry Safonov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Andrei, On 4/15/20 5:14 PM, Andrei Vagin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:02 AM Vincenzo Frascino > wrote: >> >> Hi Andrei, >> >> On 4/11/20 8:33 AM, Andrei Vagin wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:23 AM Vincenzo Frascino >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have though a question on something I encountered during the testing of the >>>> patches: I noticed that all the tests related to CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM fail on >>>> arm64 (please find the results below the scissors). Is this expected? >>> >>> static int alarm_clock_get_timespec(clockid_t which_clock, struct >>> timespec64 *tp) >>> { >>> struct alarm_base *base = &alarm_bases[clock2alarm(which_clock)]; >>> >>> if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev()) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> It is probably that you get EINVAL from here ^^^. I will send a >>> separate patch to handle this case in tests properly. >>> >> >> This makes sense :) Please let me know when you post the fix so I can test it again. > > I have sent this fix: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/15/72 > That's good, I will try it by the end of this week or beginning of next and let you know the results. >> >> Are you planning as well to rebase this set?> > What is the right tree to rebase on? > I guess master, I was asking because it would make easier my testing :) > Thanks, > Andrei > -- Regards, Vincenzo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel