All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] megaraid_sas: add mmio barrier after register writes
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:53:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f6fcc3e-a48f-7909-c409-1d265ea9135c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478857492-4581-6-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>

On 11.11.2016 10:44, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The megaraid_sas HBA only has a single register for I/O submission,
> which will be hit pretty hard with scsi-mq. To ensure that the
> PCI writes have made it across we need to add a mmio barrier
> after each write; otherwise I've been seeing spurious command
> completions and I/O stalls.

Why is it needed that the PCI write reaches the hw exactly at this point?
Is it possible that this is a hw deficiency like that the hw can't handle
communication without tiny pauses, and so possible to remove
in next generation?
Thanks,
Tomas

>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> index aba53c0..729a654 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ inline void megasas_return_cmd_fusion(struct megasas_instance *instance,
>  			le32_to_cpu(req_desc->u.low));
>  
>  	writeq(req_data, &instance->reg_set->inbound_low_queue_port);
> +	mmiowb();
>  #else
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  



  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-18 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-11  9:44 [PATCH 0/5] megaraid_sas: scsi-mq support Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-11  9:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] megaraid_sas: switch to pci_alloc_irq_vectors Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-11 11:32   ` Sumit Saxena
2016-11-11 14:59     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-14 12:33       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-14 12:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-11  9:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] megaraid_sas: avoid calling megasas_lookup_instance() Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-11 10:46   ` Sumit Saxena
2016-11-11  9:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] megaraid_sas: do not crash on invalid completion Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-11 11:51   ` Sumit Saxena
2016-11-11 15:07     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-11  9:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] megaraid_sas: scsi-mq support Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-11 11:26   ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-11 11:56   ` Sumit Saxena
2016-11-14 11:07   ` Kashyap Desai
2016-11-11  9:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] megaraid_sas: add mmio barrier after register writes Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-11 10:47   ` Sumit Saxena
2016-11-18 15:53   ` Tomas Henzl [this message]
2016-11-18 16:48     ` Kashyap Desai
2016-11-21 15:57       ` Tomas Henzl
2016-11-30  6:14         ` Kashyap Desai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f6fcc3e-a48f-7909-c409-1d265ea9135c@redhat.com \
    --to=thenzl@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.