On 04/24/2018 04:45 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> We'll soon need an enumeration type that lists all the softmmu targets
> that QEMU (the project) supports. Introduce @SysEmuTarget to
> "common.json".
> 
> Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
> Cc: David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
> ---
> 

> +##
> +{ 'enum' : 'SysEmuTarget',
> +  'data' : [ 'aarch64', 'alpha', 'arm', 'cris', 'hppa', 'i386', 'lm32',
> +             'm68k', 'microblaze', 'microblazeel', 'mips', 'mips64',
> +             'mips64el', 'mipsel', 'moxie', 'nios2', 'or1k', 'ppc',
> +             'ppc64', 'ppcemb', 'riscv32', 'riscv64', 's390x', 'sh4',
> +             'sh4eb', 'sparc', 'sparc64', 'tricore', 'unicore32',
> +             'x86_64', 'xtensa', 'xtensaeb' ] }

x86_64 doesn't match our typical conventions of preferring '-' over '_';
also, wikipedia mentions both spellings but under the page name
'x86-64'.  Is it worth switching that enum constant?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org