All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
To: "djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/27] xfs: extend transaction reservations for parent attributes
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 07:40:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f987f3e2a8cd8b20b33f2f5cc62560ed9d7828e.camel@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1hNK0aHNZYo5M/d@magnolia>

On Tue, 2022-10-25 at 13:55 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 03:29:23PM -0700,
> allison.henderson@oracle.com wrote:
> > From: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
> > 
> > We need to add, remove or modify parent pointer attributes during
> > create/link/unlink/rename operations atomically with the dirents in
> > the
> > parent directories being modified. This means they need to be
> > modified
> > in the same transaction as the parent directories, and so we need
> > to add
> > the required space for the attribute modifications to the
> > transaction
> > reservations.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 303 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > ----
> >  1 file changed, 249 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > index 5b2f27cbdb80..756b6f38c385 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
> >  #include "xfs_trans.h"
> >  #include "xfs_qm.h"
> >  #include "xfs_trans_space.h"
> > +#include "xfs_attr_item.h"
> > +#include "xfs_log.h"
> > +#include "xfs_da_format.h"
> >  
> >  #define _ALLOC true
> >  #define _FREE  false
> > @@ -426,23 +429,62 @@ xfs_calc_itruncate_reservation_minlogsize(
> >   *    the two directory btrees: 2 * (max depth + v2) * dir block
> > size
> >   *    the two directory bmap btrees: 2 * max depth * block size
> >   * And the bmap_finish transaction can free dir and bmap blocks
> > (two sets
> > - *     of bmap blocks) giving:
> > + *     of bmap blocks) giving (t2):
> >   *    the agf for the ags in which the blocks live: 3 * sector
> > size
> >   *    the agfl for the ags in which the blocks live: 3 * sector
> > size
> >   *    the superblock for the free block count: sector size
> >   *    the allocation btrees: 3 exts * 2 trees * (2 * max depth -
> > 1) * block size
> > + * If parent pointers are enabled (t3), then each transaction in
> > the chain
> > + *    must be capable of setting or removing the extended
> > attribute
> > + *    containing the parent information.  It must also be able to
> > handle
> > + *    the three xattr intent items that track the progress of the
> > parent
> > + *    pointer update.
> 
> To check my assumptions here: For a standard rename, the three xattr
> intent items are (1) replacing the pptr for the source file; (2)
> removing the pptr on the dest file; and (3) adding a pptr for the
> whiteout file in the src dir?
> 
> For an RENAME_EXCHANGE, there are two xattr intent items to replace
> the
> pptr for both src and dest files.  Link counts don't change and there
> is
> no whiteout, correct?
> 
> >   */
> >  STATIC uint
> >  xfs_calc_rename_reservation(
> >         struct xfs_mount        *mp)
> >  {
> > -       return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
> > -               max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 5) +
> > -                    xfs_calc_buf_res(2 * XFS_DIROP_LOG_COUNT(mp),
> > -                                     XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))),
> > -                   (xfs_calc_buf_res(7, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > -                    xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_block_count(mp,
> > 3),
> > -                                     XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))));
> > +       unsigned int            overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp = M_RES(mp);
> > +       unsigned int            t1, t2, t3 = 0;
> > +
> > +       t1 = xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 5) +
> > +            xfs_calc_buf_res(2 * XFS_DIROP_LOG_COUNT(mp),
> > +                       XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1));
> > +
> > +       t2 = xfs_calc_buf_res(7, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > +            xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_block_count(mp, 3),
> > +                       XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1));
> > +
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp)) {
> > +               t3 = max(resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logres,
> > +                               resp->tr_attrrm.tr_logres);
> > +               overhead += 4 * (sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item)
> > +
> 
> I'm not sure why this multiplies by four then?
> 
> The log reservation is for the ondisk structures, so the sizeof
> should
> be for xfs_attri_log_format, not xfs_attri_log_item.
> 
> > +                                (2 *
> > xlog_calc_iovec_len(XATTR_NAME_MAX)) +
> 
> I guess the 2 * XATTR_NAME_MAX is to log replacing the old name with
> the new name?
> 
> > +                                xlog_calc_iovec_len(
> > +                                       sizeof(struct
> > xfs_parent_name_rec)));
> 
> And this last one is for the xattr "name", which is just the (parent,
> gen, diroffset) structure?
> 
> I'm concerned about the overhead becoming unnecessarily large here,
> since that all comes out to:
> 
>         4 * (48 +
>              (2 * 256) +
>              16)
> 
>         = 2304 bytes?  Or 1728 bytes if we only multiply by 3?
I think it's 3, I dug back through the revisions and I think I must
have mistakenly switched inode count and pptrs

> 
> Ok, maybe I'm not so concerned after all; 2.3k isn't that large as
> compared to logging entire fsblock buffers.  These namespace
> transactions are 300-400KB in size.  Could this be reduced further,
> though?
> 
> For a regular rename, we're doing a replace, a link, and an unlink.
> 
>         (48 + (2 * 256)) +
>         (48 + 256) +
>         (48)
> 
>         = 912 bytes
> 
> For a RENAME_EXCHANGE, we're doing two replaces:
> 
>         (48 + (2 * 256)) +
>         (48 + (2 * 256))
> 
>         = 1120 bytes
> 
> I'm glad that 1728 is larger than both of those. :)
> 
> Looking forward in this patch, I see the same open-coded overhead
> calculations and wonder what you think of the following refactoring:
> 
> static inline unsigned int xfs_calc_pptr_link_overhead(void)
> {
>         return sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_format) +
>                         xlog_calc_iovec_len(XATTR_NAME_MAX) +
>                         xlog_calc_iovec_len(sizeof(struct
> xfs_parent_name_rec));
> }
> static inline unsigned int xfs_calc_pptr_unlink_overhead(void)
> {
>         return sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_format) +
>                         xlog_calc_iovec_len(sizeof(struct
> xfs_parent_name_rec));
> }
> static inline unsigned int xfs_calc_pptr_replace_overhead(void)
> {
>         return sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_format) +
>                         xlog_calc_iovec_len(XATTR_NAME_MAX) +
>                         xlog_calc_iovec_len(XATTR_NAME_MAX) +
>                         xlog_calc_iovec_len(sizeof(struct
> xfs_parent_name_rec));
> }
I think that's a descent clean up, I'll see if I can work those in

> 
> And then the above becomes:
> 
>         if (xfs_has_parent(mp)) {
>                 unsigned int    rename_overhead, exchange_overhead;
> 
>                 t3 = max(resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logres,
>                          resp->tr_attrrm.tr_logres);
> 
>                 /*
>                  * For a standard rename, the three xattr intent log
> items
>                  * are (1) replacing the pptr for the source file;
> (2)
>                  * removing the pptr on the dest file; and (3) adding
> a
>                  * pptr for the whiteout file in the src dir.
>                  *
>                  * For an RENAME_EXCHANGE, there are two xattr intent
>                  * items to replace the pptr for both src and dest
>                  * files.  Link counts don't change and there is no
>                  * whiteout.
>                  *
>                  * In the worst case we can end up relogging all log
>                  * intent items to allow the log tail to move ahead,
> so
>                  * they become overhead added to each transaction in
> a
>                  * processing chain.
>                  */
>                 rename_overhead = xfs_calc_pptr_replace_overhead() +
>                                   xfs_calc_pptr_unlink_overhead() +
>                                   xfs_calc_pptr_link_overhead();
>                 exchange_overhead = 2 *
> xfs_calc_pptr_replace_overhead();
> 
>                 overhead += max(rename_overhead, exchange_overhead);
>         }
> 
> You might want to come up with better names though.

xfs_calc_*_parent_overhead?  I'm not super picky with names, so if
there's something folks prefer let me know.

> 
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return overhead + max3(t1, t2, t3);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline unsigned int
> > +xfs_rename_log_count(
> > +       struct xfs_mount        *mp,
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp)
> > +{
> > +       /* One for the rename, one more for freeing blocks */
> > +       unsigned int            ret = XFS_RENAME_LOG_COUNT;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Pre-reserve enough log reservation to handle the
> > transaction
> > +        * rolling needed to remove or add one parent pointer.
> > +        */
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp))
> > +               ret += max(resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logcount,
> > +                          resp->tr_attrrm.tr_logcount);
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -459,6 +501,23 @@ xfs_calc_iunlink_remove_reservation(
> >                2 * M_IGEO(mp)->inode_cluster_size;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline unsigned int
> > +xfs_link_log_count(
> > +       struct xfs_mount        *mp,
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned int            ret = XFS_LINK_LOG_COUNT;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Pre-reserve enough log reservation to handle the
> > transaction
> > +        * rolling needed to add one parent pointer.
> > +        */
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp))
> > +               ret += resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logcount;
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * For creating a link to an inode:
> >   *    the parent directory inode: inode size
> > @@ -475,14 +534,27 @@ STATIC uint
> >  xfs_calc_link_reservation(
> >         struct xfs_mount        *mp)
> >  {
> > -       return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
> > -               xfs_calc_iunlink_remove_reservation(mp) +
> > -               max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 2) +
> > -                    xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DIROP_LOG_COUNT(mp),
> > -                                     XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))),
> > -                   (xfs_calc_buf_res(3, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > -                    xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_block_count(mp,
> > 1),
> > -                                     XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))));
> > +       unsigned int            overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp = M_RES(mp);
> > +       unsigned int            t1, t2, t2_1, t2_2, t3 = 0;
> > +
> > +       t1 = xfs_calc_iunlink_remove_reservation(mp);
> > +       t2_1 = xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 2) +
> > +              xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DIROP_LOG_COUNT(mp),
> > XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1));
> > +       t2_2 = xfs_calc_buf_res(3, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > +              xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_block_count(mp, 1),
> > +                               XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1));
> > +       t2 = max(t2_1, t2_2);
> 
> Add xfs_calc_iunlink_remove_reservation to overhead, rename t2_1 to
> t1
> and t2_2 to t2, and the return statement can become:
> 
>         return overhead + max3(t1, t2, t3);
Ok, will update

> 
> > +
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp)) {
> > +               t3 = resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logres;
> > +               overhead += sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item) +
> > +                           xlog_calc_iovec_len(XATTR_NAME_MAX) +
> > +                           xlog_calc_iovec_len(
> > +                                       sizeof(struct
> > xfs_parent_name_rec));
> 
>                 overhead += xfs_calc_pptr_link_overhead();
Ok, will add
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return overhead + t1 + t2 + t3;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -497,6 +569,23 @@ xfs_calc_iunlink_add_reservation(xfs_mount_t
> > *mp)
> >                         M_IGEO(mp)->inode_cluster_size;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline unsigned int
> > +xfs_remove_log_count(
> > +       struct xfs_mount        *mp,
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned int            ret = XFS_REMOVE_LOG_COUNT;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Pre-reserve enough log reservation to handle the
> > transaction
> > +        * rolling needed to add one parent pointer.
> > +        */
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp))
> > +               ret += resp->tr_attrrm.tr_logcount;
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * For removing a directory entry we can modify:
> >   *    the parent directory inode: inode size
> > @@ -513,14 +602,27 @@ STATIC uint
> >  xfs_calc_remove_reservation(
> >         struct xfs_mount        *mp)
> >  {
> > -       return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
> > -               xfs_calc_iunlink_add_reservation(mp) +
> > -               max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 2) +
> > -                    xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DIROP_LOG_COUNT(mp),
> > -                                     XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))),
> > -                   (xfs_calc_buf_res(4, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > -                    xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_block_count(mp,
> > 2),
> > -                                     XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))));
> > +       unsigned int            overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp = M_RES(mp);
> > +       unsigned int            t1, t2, t2_1, t2_2, t3 = 0;
> > +
> > +       t1 = xfs_calc_iunlink_add_reservation(mp);
> > +
> > +       t2_1 = xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 2) +
> > +              xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DIROP_LOG_COUNT(mp),
> > XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1));
> > +       t2_2 = xfs_calc_buf_res(4, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
> > +              xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_block_count(mp, 2),
> > +                               XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1));
> > +       t2 = max(t2_1, t2_2);
> 
> Similar to the last _reservation function -- add
> xfs_calc_iunlink_add_reservation to overhead, rename t2_1 to t1 and
> t2_2
> to t2 and the return statement becomes:
> 
>         return overhead + max3(t1, t2, t3);
> 
Right, same thing here

> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp)) {
> > +               t3 = resp->tr_attrrm.tr_logres;
> > +               overhead += sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item) +
> > +                           xlog_calc_iovec_len(
> > +                                       sizeof(struct
> > xfs_parent_name_rec));
> 
>                 overhead += xfs_calc_pptr_unlink_overhead();
> 
Will update
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return overhead + t1 + t2 + t3;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -569,12 +671,39 @@ xfs_calc_icreate_resv_alloc(
> >                 xfs_calc_finobt_res(mp);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline unsigned int
> > +xfs_icreate_log_count(
> > +       struct xfs_mount        *mp,
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned int            ret = XFS_CREATE_LOG_COUNT;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Pre-reserve enough log reservation to handle the
> > transaction
> > +        * rolling needed to add one parent pointer.
> > +        */
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp))
> > +               ret += resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logcount;
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  STATIC uint
> > -xfs_calc_icreate_reservation(xfs_mount_t *mp)
> > +xfs_calc_icreate_reservation(
> > +       struct xfs_mount        *mp)
> >  {
> > -       return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
> > -               max(xfs_calc_icreate_resv_alloc(mp),
> > -                   xfs_calc_create_resv_modify(mp));
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp = M_RES(mp);
> > +       unsigned int            ret = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
> > +                                    
> > max(xfs_calc_icreate_resv_alloc(mp),
> > +                                    
> > xfs_calc_create_resv_modify(mp));
> 
> Stylistic complaint: Please follow the same format as the other _calc
> functions:
> 
>         unsigned int            overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
>         unsigned int            t1, t2, t3 = 0;
> 
>         t1 = xfs_calc_icreate_resv_alloc(mp);
>         t2 = xfs_calc_create_resv_modify(mp);
> 
>         if (xfs_has_parent(mp)) {
>                 t3 = resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logres;
>                 overhead += xfs_calc_pptr_link_overhead();
>         }
> 
>         return overhead + max3(t1, t2, t3);
> 
Sure, will update
> > +
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp))
> > +               ret += resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logres +
> > +                      sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item) +
> > +                      xlog_calc_iovec_len(XATTR_NAME_MAX) +
> > +                      xlog_calc_iovec_len(
> > +                                       sizeof(struct
> > xfs_parent_name_rec));
> > +       return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  STATIC uint
> > @@ -587,6 +716,23 @@ xfs_calc_create_tmpfile_reservation(
> >         return res + xfs_calc_iunlink_add_reservation(mp);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline unsigned int
> > +xfs_mkdir_log_count(
> > +       struct xfs_mount        *mp,
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned int            ret = XFS_MKDIR_LOG_COUNT;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Pre-reserve enough log reservation to handle the
> > transaction
> > +        * rolling needed to add one parent pointer.
> > +        */
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp))
> > +               ret += resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logcount;
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Making a new directory is the same as creating a new file.
> >   */
> > @@ -597,6 +743,22 @@ xfs_calc_mkdir_reservation(
> >         return xfs_calc_icreate_reservation(mp);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline unsigned int
> > +xfs_symlink_log_count(
> > +       struct xfs_mount        *mp,
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned int            ret = XFS_SYMLINK_LOG_COUNT;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Pre-reserve enough log reservation to handle the
> > transaction
> > +        * rolling needed to add one parent pointer.
> > +        */
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp))
> > +               ret += resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logcount;
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Making a new symplink is the same as creating a new file, but
> > @@ -607,8 +769,17 @@ STATIC uint
> >  xfs_calc_symlink_reservation(
> >         struct xfs_mount        *mp)
> >  {
> > -       return xfs_calc_icreate_reservation(mp) +
> > -              xfs_calc_buf_res(1, XFS_SYMLINK_MAXLEN);
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp = M_RES(mp);
> > +       unsigned int            ret =
> > xfs_calc_icreate_reservation(mp) +
> > +                                     xfs_calc_buf_res(1,
> > XFS_SYMLINK_MAXLEN);
> > +
> > +       if (xfs_has_parent(mp))
> > +               ret += resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logres +
> > +                      sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item) +
> > +                      xlog_calc_iovec_len(XATTR_NAME_MAX) +
> > +                      xlog_calc_iovec_len(
> > +                                       sizeof(struct
> > xfs_parent_name_rec));
> 
> Didn't we already account for the pptr log item overhead in
> xfs_calc_icreate_reservation?
> 
Oh, I think youre right, so this one can go away.

> > +       return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -909,54 +1080,76 @@ xfs_calc_sb_reservation(
> >         return xfs_calc_buf_res(1, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize);
> >  }
> >  
> > -void
> > -xfs_trans_resv_calc(
> > +/*
> > + * Namespace reservations.
> > + *
> > + * These get tricky when parent pointers are enabled as we have
> > attribute
> > + * modifications occurring from within these transactions. Rather
> > than confuse
> > + * each of these reservation calculations with the conditional
> > attribute
> > + * reservations, add them here in a clear and concise manner. This
> > assumes that
> 
> s/assumes/requires/ since you put in ASSERTs :)
> 
Sure, will update.  Thanks for the reviews!
Allison

> --D
> 
> > + * the attribute reservations have already been calculated.
> > + *
> > + * Note that we only include the static attribute reservation
> > here; the runtime
> > + * reservation will have to be modified by the size of the
> > attributes being
> > + * added/removed/modified. See the comments on the attribute
> > reservation
> > + * calculations for more details.
> > + */
> > +STATIC void
> > +xfs_calc_namespace_reservations(
> >         struct xfs_mount        *mp,
> >         struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp)
> >  {
> > -       int                     logcount_adj = 0;
> > -
> > -       /*
> > -        * The following transactions are logged in physical format
> > and
> > -        * require a permanent reservation on space.
> > -        */
> > -       resp->tr_write.tr_logres = xfs_calc_write_reservation(mp,
> > false);
> > -       resp->tr_write.tr_logcount = XFS_WRITE_LOG_COUNT;
> > -       resp->tr_write.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> > -
> > -       resp->tr_itruncate.tr_logres =
> > xfs_calc_itruncate_reservation(mp, false);
> > -       resp->tr_itruncate.tr_logcount = XFS_ITRUNCATE_LOG_COUNT;
> > -       resp->tr_itruncate.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> > +       ASSERT(resp->tr_attrsetm.tr_logres > 0);
> >  
> >         resp->tr_rename.tr_logres =
> > xfs_calc_rename_reservation(mp);
> > -       resp->tr_rename.tr_logcount = XFS_RENAME_LOG_COUNT;
> > +       resp->tr_rename.tr_logcount = xfs_rename_log_count(mp,
> > resp);
> >         resp->tr_rename.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> >  
> >         resp->tr_link.tr_logres = xfs_calc_link_reservation(mp);
> > -       resp->tr_link.tr_logcount = XFS_LINK_LOG_COUNT;
> > +       resp->tr_link.tr_logcount = xfs_link_log_count(mp, resp);
> >         resp->tr_link.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> >  
> >         resp->tr_remove.tr_logres =
> > xfs_calc_remove_reservation(mp);
> > -       resp->tr_remove.tr_logcount = XFS_REMOVE_LOG_COUNT;
> > +       resp->tr_remove.tr_logcount = xfs_remove_log_count(mp,
> > resp);
> >         resp->tr_remove.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> >  
> >         resp->tr_symlink.tr_logres =
> > xfs_calc_symlink_reservation(mp);
> > -       resp->tr_symlink.tr_logcount = XFS_SYMLINK_LOG_COUNT;
> > +       resp->tr_symlink.tr_logcount = xfs_symlink_log_count(mp,
> > resp);
> >         resp->tr_symlink.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> >  
> >         resp->tr_create.tr_logres =
> > xfs_calc_icreate_reservation(mp);
> > -       resp->tr_create.tr_logcount = XFS_CREATE_LOG_COUNT;
> > +       resp->tr_create.tr_logcount = xfs_icreate_log_count(mp,
> > resp);
> >         resp->tr_create.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> >  
> > +       resp->tr_mkdir.tr_logres = xfs_calc_mkdir_reservation(mp);
> > +       resp->tr_mkdir.tr_logcount = xfs_mkdir_log_count(mp, resp);
> > +       resp->tr_mkdir.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void
> > +xfs_trans_resv_calc(
> > +       struct xfs_mount        *mp,
> > +       struct xfs_trans_resv   *resp)
> > +{
> > +       int                     logcount_adj = 0;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * The following transactions are logged in physical format
> > and
> > +        * require a permanent reservation on space.
> > +        */
> > +       resp->tr_write.tr_logres = xfs_calc_write_reservation(mp,
> > false);
> > +       resp->tr_write.tr_logcount = XFS_WRITE_LOG_COUNT;
> > +       resp->tr_write.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> > +
> > +       resp->tr_itruncate.tr_logres =
> > xfs_calc_itruncate_reservation(mp, false);
> > +       resp->tr_itruncate.tr_logcount = XFS_ITRUNCATE_LOG_COUNT;
> > +       resp->tr_itruncate.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> > +
> >         resp->tr_create_tmpfile.tr_logres =
> >                         xfs_calc_create_tmpfile_reservation(mp);
> >         resp->tr_create_tmpfile.tr_logcount =
> > XFS_CREATE_TMPFILE_LOG_COUNT;
> >         resp->tr_create_tmpfile.tr_logflags |=
> > XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> >  
> > -       resp->tr_mkdir.tr_logres = xfs_calc_mkdir_reservation(mp);
> > -       resp->tr_mkdir.tr_logcount = XFS_MKDIR_LOG_COUNT;
> > -       resp->tr_mkdir.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> > -
> >         resp->tr_ifree.tr_logres = xfs_calc_ifree_reservation(mp);
> >         resp->tr_ifree.tr_logcount = XFS_INACTIVE_LOG_COUNT;
> >         resp->tr_ifree.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> > @@ -986,6 +1179,8 @@ xfs_trans_resv_calc(
> >         resp->tr_qm_dqalloc.tr_logcount = XFS_WRITE_LOG_COUNT;
> >         resp->tr_qm_dqalloc.tr_logflags |= XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
> >  
> > +       xfs_calc_namespace_reservations(mp, resp);
> > +
> >         /*
> >          * The following transactions are logged in logical format
> > with
> >          * a default log count.
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21 22:29 [PATCH v4 00/27] Parent Pointers allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] xfs: Add new name to attri/d allison.henderson
2022-10-25 19:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] xfs: Increase XFS_DEFER_OPS_NR_INODES to 5 allison.henderson
2022-10-28  1:52   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] xfs: Hold inode locks in xfs_ialloc allison.henderson
2022-10-28  1:54   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] xfs: Hold inode locks in xfs_trans_alloc_dir allison.henderson
2022-10-28  1:56   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] xfs: Hold inode locks in xfs_rename allison.henderson
2022-10-28  1:59   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] xfs: Expose init_xattrs in xfs_create_tmpfile allison.henderson
2022-10-25 19:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-25 21:33     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40       ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] xfs: get directory offset when adding directory name allison.henderson
2022-10-28  2:02   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] xfs: get directory offset when removing " allison.henderson
2022-10-28  2:06   ` Catherine Hoang
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 09/27] xfs: get directory offset when replacing a " allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] xfs: add parent pointer support to attribute code allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] xfs: define parent pointer xattr format allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] xfs: Add xfs_verify_pptr allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] xfs: Increase rename inode reservation allison.henderson
2022-10-25 19:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] xfs: extend transaction reservations for parent attributes allison.henderson
2022-10-25 20:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson [this message]
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] xfs: parent pointer attribute creation allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:11   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] xfs: add parent attributes to link allison.henderson
2022-10-25 20:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] xfs: add parent attributes to symlink allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] xfs: remove parent pointers in unlink allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] xfs: Add parent pointers to xfs_cross_rename allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] xfs: Indent xfs_rename allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] xfs: Add parent pointers to rename allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] xfs: Add the parent pointer support to the superblock version 5 allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] xfs: Add helper function xfs_attr_list_context_init allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] xfs: Filter XFS_ATTR_PARENT for getfattr allison.henderson
2022-10-25 21:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  7:40     ` Allison Henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] xfs: Add parent pointer ioctl allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] xfs: fix unit conversion error in xfs_log_calc_max_attrsetm_res allison.henderson
2022-10-21 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] xfs: drop compatibility minimum log size computations for reflink allison.henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f987f3e2a8cd8b20b33f2f5cc62560ed9d7828e.camel@oracle.com \
    --to=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.