All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: "Keith Wiles" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
	"Hongzhi Guo" <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>,
	"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on IP options packets
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:48:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fa9bc52-0862-983e-3e38-33a937872571@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427135755.927-2-olivier.matz@6wind.com>

On 4/27/2021 2:57 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> When packet type is IPV4_EXT, the checksum is always marked as good in
> the mbuf offload flags.
> 
> Since we know the header lengths, we can easily call
> rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum() in this case too.
> 
> Fixes: 8ae3023387e9 ("net/tap: add Rx/Tx checksum offload support")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> index 68baa18523..e7b185a4b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ tap_verify_csum(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
>  		/* Don't verify checksum for multi-segment packets. */
>  		if (mbuf->nb_segs > 1)
>  			return;
> -		if (l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4) {
> +		if (l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4 || l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4_EXT) {

Should we take 'RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN' into account?

>  			if (l4 == RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) {
>  				udp_hdr = (struct rte_udp_hdr *)l4_hdr;
>  				if (udp_hdr->dgram_cksum == 0) {
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ tap_verify_csum(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
>  				}
>  			}
>  			cksum = ~rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
> -		} else if (l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6) {
> +		} else { /* l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6, checked above */
>  			cksum = ~rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
>  		}
>  		mbuf->ol_flags |= cksum ?
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-30 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-27 13:57 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum Olivier Matz
2021-04-27 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on IP options packets Olivier Matz
2021-04-30 14:48   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-06-08 10:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-08 12:29       ` Olivier Matz
2021-06-08 12:34         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-08 12:49           ` Olivier Matz
2021-06-08 13:57             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-08 14:30               ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-27 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on TCP packets Olivier Matz
2021-06-08 10:18   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-27 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net: introduce functions to verify L4 checksums Olivier Matz
2021-04-27 15:02   ` Morten Brørup
2021-04-27 15:07   ` Morten Brørup
2021-04-28 12:21     ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-28 12:42       ` Morten Brørup
2021-04-30 15:42   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-08 10:23     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-08 12:29       ` Olivier Matz
2021-06-08 12:39         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-25 15:38           ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-27 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] test/cksum: new test for L3/L4 checksum API Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on IP options packets Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on TCP packets Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net: introduce functions to verify L4 checksums Olivier Matz
2021-06-30 13:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/cksum: new test for L3/L4 checksum API Olivier Matz
2021-07-01  9:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum Andrew Rybchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5fa9bc52-0862-983e-3e38-33a937872571@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=guohongzhi1@huawei.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.