From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eydEt-0004ov-LY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:53:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eydEn-0003w0-Q8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:53:11 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:36748 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eydEn-0003ve-LI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:53:05 -0400 References: <20180320190023.24077-1-yuval.shaia@oracle.com> From: Marcel Apfelbaum Message-ID: <5ff502e3-4623-a097-4b83-68b68d7a76aa@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:53:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180320190023.24077-1-yuval.shaia@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ihw/rdma: Implementation of Query QP verb List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Yuval Shaia , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Michael Tsirkin Hi Yuval, On 20/03/2018 21:00, Yuval Shaia wrote: > Please review implementation of Query QP verb which is needed by some RDMA > applications. > > Patch #1: Implementation in rdma backend layer > Patch #2: Add support to pvrdma device > > v0 -> v1: > * Split to two patches, one for rdma and one for pvrdma > Actually previous version was V1, this one is V2 :) Next time please add V2 (V3...) prefix and I suggest using --cover-letter when using git format-patch/send email instead of manually adding it. > [PATCH v1 1/2] hw/rdma: Add Query QP operation > [PATCH v1 2/2] hw/rdma: Add support for Query QP verb to pvrdma Second patch should have maybe rdma/vmw since is VMware specific (next time) > I am thinking adding it to 2.12, it can be seen as a bug-fix, querying QP is a basic operation the device should answer to. Michael, sounds reasonable? Reviewed-by: Marcel Apfelbaum Thanks, Marcel