From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
"Florent Revest" <revest@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"Brendan Jackman" <jackmanb@google.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/11] Atomics for eBPF
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:09:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ffffc36c3ffa_1eeef2081e@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112154235.2192781-1-jackmanb@google.com>
Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Happy new year everyone, and thanks once again for the reviews.
>
> There's still one unresolved review comment from John[3] but I don't
> think it needs to block the patchset as it stands, it can be a
> separate patch. Hope that's OK.
Its ok on my side if it comes as a follow up. I think it limits the
use cases without it, but no reason to hold up the series IMO.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 15:42 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/11] Atomics for eBPF Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/11] bpf: x86: Factor out emission of ModR/M for *(reg + off) Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/11] bpf: x86: Factor out emission of REX byte Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/11] bpf: x86: Factor out a lookup table for some ALU opcodes Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/11] bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm Brendan Jackman
2021-01-13 2:20 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-13 2:20 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/11] bpf: Move BPF_STX reserved field check into BPF_STX verifier code Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/11] bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create atomic_fetch_add instruction Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/11] bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/11] bpf: Pull out a macro for interpreting atomic ALU operations Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/11] bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/11] bpf: Add tests for new BPF atomic operations Brendan Jackman
2021-01-12 15:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/11] bpf: Document new atomic instructions Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 3:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/11] Atomics for eBPF Alexei Starovoitov
2021-01-14 8:09 ` John Fastabend [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ffffc36c3ffa_1eeef2081e@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.