From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] PM / core: Add NEVER_SKIP and SMART_PREPARE driver flags Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:05:11 +0200 Message-ID: <6007227.iNoRbQyInB@aspire.rjw.lan> References: <3806130.B2KCK0tvef@aspire.rjw.lan> <1998650.Q52BuGQTI4@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171016062852.GA28732@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171016062852.GA28732@kroah.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Linux PM , Bjorn Helgaas , Alan Stern , LKML , Linux ACPI , Linux PCI , Linux Documentation , Mika Westerberg , Ulf Hansson , Andy Shevchenko , Kevin Hilman , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Monday, October 16, 2017 8:28:52 AM CEST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:29:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > struct dev_pm_info { > > pm_message_t power_state; > > unsigned int can_wakeup:1; > > @@ -561,6 +580,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info { > > bool is_late_suspended:1; > > bool early_init:1; /* Owned by the PM core */ > > bool direct_complete:1; /* Owned by the PM core */ > > + unsigned int driver_flags; > > Minor nit, u32 or u64? u32 I think, will update. BTW, there's a mess in this struct overall and I'd like all of the bit fileds to be the same type (and that shouldn't be bool IMO :-)). Do you prefer u32 or unsinged int? Thanks, Rafael