From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: [xenomai-images][PATCH 0/2] add xenomai 3.1.x to pipeline MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit In-reply-to: <2c1c5b9d-ebce-18e3-590e-2309d4306513@siemens.com> References: <20201218094945.6941-1-Quirin.Gylstorff@siemens.com> <598760.1608297747@gemini.denx.de> <2c1c5b9d-ebce-18e3-590e-2309d4306513@siemens.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:15:36 +0100 Message-ID: <602475.1608304536@gemini.denx.de> List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gylstorff Quirin Cc: "Q. Gylstorff via Xenomai" , Jan.kiszka@siemens.com Dear Quirin, In message <2c1c5b9d-ebce-18e3-590e-2309d4306513@siemens.com> you wrote: > > > Is there a specific reason why all the new files come under a MIT > > license, and not GPL ? > > I think you mix the two repositories 'xenomai-images' with 'xenomai' up. Not really. > The code in 'xenomai-images' was from the beginning MIT. The source code > in the 'xenomai' repository is still GPL. This des not answer my question. I asked _why_ this is MIT licensed. I can see no good reason for not using GPL here, too ? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de "Summit meetings tend to be like panda matings. The expectations are always high, and the results usually disappointing." - Robert Orben