From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Romain Naour Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 16:44:44 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] package/tzdata: bump version to 2020f In-Reply-To: <877dnad5ux.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <20210110164711.1708062-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20210110164711.1708062-2-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <87zh1ekq9r.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <19dff490-6537-bc7d-7035-e4bd99f97452@gmail.com> <877dnad5ux.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <602ba0f2-503c-7175-c4fb-7dcac246631c@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Peter, Le 14/02/2021 ? 16:30, Peter Korsgaard a ?crit?: >>>>>> "Romain" == Romain Naour writes: > > > Hello, > > Le 12/01/2021 ? 18:40, Peter Korsgaard a ?crit?: > >>>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Kuhls writes: > >> > >> > Release notes: > >> > https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2020-December/000064.html > >> > >> > Upstream removed timezones pacificnew and systemv: > >> > https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2020-October/000059.html > >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls > >> > >> Committed to 2020.02.x and 2020.11.x, thanks. > >> > > > This version bump seems introduce a regression in the Buildroot testsuite for > > timezone tests TestGlibcAllTimezone and TestGlibcNonDefaultLimitedTimezone. > > > See: > > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/pipelines/253940390/failures > > > The Buildroot configuration was: > > BR2_TARGET_TZ_INFO=y > > BR2_TARGET_TZ_ZONELIST="northamerica" > > BR2_TARGET_LOCALTIME="America/New_York" > > > And the test is checking "date" output: > > > tz, _ = self.emulator.run("date +%Z") > > self.assertEqual(tz[0].strip(), "EST") > > > tz, _ = self.emulator.run("TZ=UTC date +%Z") > > self.assertEqual(tz[0].strip(), "UTC") > > > tz, _ = self.emulator.run("TZ=America/Los_Angeles date +%Z") > > self.assertEqual(tz[0].strip(), "PST") > > > tz, _ = self.emulator.run("TZ=Europe/Paris date +%Z") > > self.assertEqual(tz[0].strip(), "Europe") > > > This patch has been backported to stable version 2020.11.2 and 2020.02.10. > > Can you have a look? > > Are you able to reproduce it? When I gave it a quick test here I got > sensible output from date. > > But maybe I missed something? > Yes, I tried on master, 2020.02.x, 2020.11.x and 2020.02.9 and 2020.11.1 (before the version bump). I'm looking at it but I don't have a patch yet. Best regards, Romain