From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail5.wrs.com (mail5.windriver.com [192.103.53.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B090877CD8 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v3B8oRVO011354 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:50:27 -0700 Received: from [128.224.162.180] (128.224.162.180) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:50:27 -0700 To: Richard Purdie , References: <20170410103425.333195-1-yuanjie.huang@windriver.com> <1491862224.6264.0.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <79336d8d-845d-b4ef-7eb5-acc8f10f675d@windriver.com> <1491895696.12091.6.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Yuanjie Huang Message-ID: <6043fb32-f155-8b05-4fb8-7e320ab55422@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:50:25 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1491895696.12091.6.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] binutils: Fix CVE-2017-6965 and CVE-2017-6966 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:50:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/11/2017 03:28 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 14:18 +0800, Yuanjie Huang wrote: >> On 04/11/2017 06:10 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 03:34 -0700, Yuanjie Huang wrote: >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.27.inc >>> Given master contains 2.28, I don't think this patch was based on >>> or >>> tested against master? >> Not yet, I will work on that, and will send the patch for master >> later. >> Our current product is based on Morty, so I fixed it first. > If a patch is against morty, you need to say that when you post it. > > The patch will not be accepted until master has the issue resolved. > > If the issue isn't present in master, you should mention that. I sent that mail without realizing that I forgot the morty tag, now both patches for morty and master are sent. Best, Yuanjie > Cheers, > > Richard