All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Anna Schumaker <schumaker.anna@gmail.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
	Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] NFSD: Repeal and replace the READ_PLUS implementation
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 13:53:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6061D3BA-A457-4CA0-9638-9A7D90379610@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFX2JfnxCYF6FSk6k5gfNA+oCRSf-xfqdZY9Hcog2MaL1PdaOg@mail.gmail.com>



> On May 17, 2022, at 9:39 AM, Anna Schumaker <schumaker.anna@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 11:16 PM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 16, 2022, at 4:35 PM, Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com wrote:
>>> 
>>> From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
>>> 
>>> Rather than relying on the underlying filesystem to tell us where hole
>>> and data segments are through vfs_llseek(), let's instead do the hole
>>> compression ourselves. This has a few advantages over the old
>>> implementation:
>>> 
>>> 1) A single call to the underlying filesystem through nfsd_readv() means
>>>  the file can't change from underneath us in the middle of encoding.
>>> 2) A single call to the underlying filestem also means that the
>>>  underlying filesystem only needs to synchronize cached and on-disk
>>>  data one time instead of potentially many speeding up the reply.
>>> 3) Hole support for filesystems that don't support SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA
>>> 
>>> I also included an optimization where we can cut down on the amount of
>>> memory being shifed around by doing the compression as (hole, data)
>>> pairs.
>>> 
>>> This patch not only fixes xfstests generic/091 and generic/263
>>> for me but the "-g quick" group tests also finish about a minute faster.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
>> 
>> Hi Anna, some general comments on the NFSD pieces:
> 
> Thanks for looking over this!
> 
>> 
>> - Doesn't READ have the same issue that the file bytes can't change
>>  until the Reply is fully sent? I would think the payload data
>>  can't change until there is no possibility of a transport-layer
>>  retransmit. Also, special restrictions like this should be
>>  documented via code comments, IMHO.
> 
> The problem with the current READ_PLUS code is that the first segment
> in the reply could already be stale data by the time the last segment
> has been encoded. So we're returning a view of the file from multiple
> points in time. READ only does the single call into the vfs, so it
> doesn't have the same race that's causing issues.

IIUI readv might pull the payload into a buffer, but spliced reads
don't. I realize you can't use splice here, but it seems like splice
would have to guarantee the payload data was immutable while the
Reply is transmitted... maybe that same mechanism could be used here.

Just spit-balling!


>> - David Howells might be interested in this approach, as he had some
>>  concerns about compressing files in place that would appear to
>>  apply also to READ_PLUS. Please copy David on the next round of
>>  these patches.
> 
> Will do!
> 
>> 
>> - Can you say why the READ_PLUS decoder and encoder operates on
>>  struct xdr_buf instead of struct xdr_stream? I'd prefer xdr_stream
>>  if you can. You could get rid of write_bytes_to_xdr_buf,
>>  xdr_encode_word and xdr_encode_double and use the stream-based
>>  helpers.
> 
> I think my reason was that write_bytes_to_xdr_buf() and
> xdr_encode_word() already took the xdr_buf, so I was matching the
> style. I can change everything over to xdr_stream easily enough, since
> the xdr_bufs in question are always attached to the xdr_stream. Would
> you prefer it if I rework the existing functions as part of this patch
> series, or as a separate prerequisite series?
> 
>> 
>> - Instead of using naked integers, please use multiples of XDR_UNIT.
> 
> I hadn't encountered XDR_UNIT before, but I can do that.
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> ---
>>> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>> index da92e7d2ab6a..973b4a1e7990 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>> @@ -4731,81 +4731,121 @@ nfsd4_encode_offload_status(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, __be32 nfserr,
>>>      return nfserr;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> +struct read_plus_segment {
>>> +     enum data_content4 type;
>>> +     unsigned long offset;
>>> +     unsigned long length;
>>> +     unsigned int page_pos;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static __be32
>>> -nfsd4_encode_read_plus_data(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp,
>>> -                         struct nfsd4_read *read,
>>> -                         unsigned long *maxcount, u32 *eof,
>>> -                         loff_t *pos)
>>> +nfsd4_read_plus_readv(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, struct nfsd4_read *read,
>>> +                   unsigned long *maxcount, u32 *eof)
>>> {
>>>      struct xdr_stream *xdr = resp->xdr;
>>> -     struct file *file = read->rd_nf->nf_file;
>>> -     int starting_len = xdr->buf->len;
>>> -     loff_t hole_pos;
>>> -     __be32 nfserr;
>>> -     __be32 *p, tmp;
>>> -     __be64 tmp64;
>>> -
>>> -     hole_pos = pos ? *pos : vfs_llseek(file, read->rd_offset, SEEK_HOLE);
>>> -     if (hole_pos > read->rd_offset)
>>> -             *maxcount = min_t(unsigned long, *maxcount, hole_pos - read->rd_offset);
>>> -     *maxcount = min_t(unsigned long, *maxcount, (xdr->buf->buflen - xdr->buf->len));
>>> -
>>> -     /* Content type, offset, byte count */
>>> -     p = xdr_reserve_space(xdr, 4 + 8 + 4);
>>> -     if (!p)
>>> -             return nfserr_resource;
>>> +     unsigned int starting_len = xdr->buf->len;
>>> +     __be32 nfserr, zero = xdr_zero;
>>> +     int pad;
>>> 
>>> +     /* xdr_reserve_space_vec() switches us to the xdr->pages */
>>>      read->rd_vlen = xdr_reserve_space_vec(xdr, resp->rqstp->rq_vec, *maxcount);
>>>      if (read->rd_vlen < 0)
>>>              return nfserr_resource;
>>> 
>>> -     nfserr = nfsd_readv(resp->rqstp, read->rd_fhp, file, read->rd_offset,
>>> -                         resp->rqstp->rq_vec, read->rd_vlen, maxcount, eof);
>>> +     nfserr = nfsd_readv(resp->rqstp, read->rd_fhp, read->rd_nf->nf_file,
>>> +                         read->rd_offset, resp->rqstp->rq_vec, read->rd_vlen,
>>> +                         maxcount, eof);
>>>      if (nfserr)
>>>              return nfserr;
>>> -     xdr_truncate_encode(xdr, starting_len + 16 + xdr_align_size(*maxcount));
>>> +     xdr_truncate_encode(xdr, starting_len + xdr_align_size(*maxcount));
>>> 
>>> -     tmp = htonl(NFS4_CONTENT_DATA);
>>> -     write_bytes_to_xdr_buf(xdr->buf, starting_len,      &tmp,   4);
>>> -     tmp64 = cpu_to_be64(read->rd_offset);
>>> -     write_bytes_to_xdr_buf(xdr->buf, starting_len + 4,  &tmp64, 8);
>>> -     tmp = htonl(*maxcount);
>>> -     write_bytes_to_xdr_buf(xdr->buf, starting_len + 12, &tmp,   4);
>>> -
>>> -     tmp = xdr_zero;
>>> -     write_bytes_to_xdr_buf(xdr->buf, starting_len + 16 + *maxcount, &tmp,
>>> -                            xdr_pad_size(*maxcount));
>>> +     pad = (*maxcount&3) ? 4 - (*maxcount&3) : 0;
>>> +     write_bytes_to_xdr_buf(xdr->buf, starting_len + *maxcount, &zero, pad);
>>>      return nfs_ok;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> +static void
>>> +nfsd4_encode_read_plus_segment(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
>>> +                            struct read_plus_segment *segment,
>>> +                            unsigned int *bufpos, unsigned int *segments)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct xdr_buf *buf = xdr->buf;
>>> +
>>> +     xdr_encode_word(buf, *bufpos, segment->type);
>>> +     xdr_encode_double(buf, *bufpos + 4, segment->offset);
>>> +
>>> +     if (segment->type == NFS4_CONTENT_HOLE) {
>>> +             xdr_encode_double(buf, *bufpos + 12, segment->length);
>>> +             *bufpos += 4 + 8 + 8;
>>> +     } else {
>>> +             size_t align = xdr_align_size(segment->length);
>>> +             xdr_encode_word(buf, *bufpos + 12, segment->length);
>>> +             if (*segments == 0)
>>> +                     xdr_buf_trim_head(buf, 4);
>>> +
>>> +             xdr_stream_move_segment(xdr,
>>> +                             buf->head[0].iov_len + segment->page_pos,
>>> +                             *bufpos + 16, align);
>> 
>> The term "segment" is overloaded in general, and in particular
>> here. xdr_stream_move_subsegment() might be a less confusing
>> name for this helper.
> 
> Sure, no problem.
> 
>> 
>> However I don't immediately see a benefit from working with the
>> xdr_buf here. Can't you do these operations entirely with the
>> passed-in xdr_stream?
> 
> I assume so, since the xdr_buf is part of the xdr_stream
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> +             *bufpos += 4 + 8 + 4 + align;
>>> +     }
>>> +
>>> +     *segments += 1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static __be32
>>> -nfsd4_encode_read_plus_hole(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp,
>>> -                         struct nfsd4_read *read,
>>> -                         unsigned long *maxcount, u32 *eof)
>>> +nfsd4_encode_read_plus_segments(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp,
>>> +                             struct nfsd4_read *read,
>>> +                             unsigned int *segments, u32 *eof)
>>> {
>>> -     struct file *file = read->rd_nf->nf_file;
>>> -     loff_t data_pos = vfs_llseek(file, read->rd_offset, SEEK_DATA);
>>> -     loff_t f_size = i_size_read(file_inode(file));
>>> -     unsigned long count;
>>> -     __be32 *p;
>>> +     enum data_content4 pagetype;
>>> +     struct read_plus_segment segment;
>>> +     struct xdr_stream *xdr = resp->xdr;
>>> +     unsigned long offset = read->rd_offset;
>>> +     unsigned int bufpos = xdr->buf->len;
>>> +     unsigned long maxcount;
>>> +     unsigned int pagelen, i = 0;
>>> +     char *vpage, *p;
>>> +     __be32 nfserr;
>>> 
>>> -     if (data_pos == -ENXIO)
>>> -             data_pos = f_size;
>>> -     else if (data_pos <= read->rd_offset || (data_pos < f_size && data_pos % PAGE_SIZE))
>>> -             return nfsd4_encode_read_plus_data(resp, read, maxcount, eof, &f_size);
>>> -     count = data_pos - read->rd_offset;
>>> -
>>> -     /* Content type, offset, byte count */
>>> -     p = xdr_reserve_space(resp->xdr, 4 + 8 + 8);
>>> -     if (!p)
>>> +     /* enough space for a HOLE segment before we switch to the pages */
>>> +     if (!xdr_reserve_space(xdr, 4 + 8 + 8))
>>>              return nfserr_resource;
>>> +     xdr_commit_encode(xdr);
>>> 
>>> -     *p++ = htonl(NFS4_CONTENT_HOLE);
>>> -     p = xdr_encode_hyper(p, read->rd_offset);
>>> -     p = xdr_encode_hyper(p, count);
>>> +     maxcount = min_t(unsigned long, read->rd_length,
>>> +                      (xdr->buf->buflen - xdr->buf->len));
>>> 
>>> -     *eof = (read->rd_offset + count) >= f_size;
>>> -     *maxcount = min_t(unsigned long, count, *maxcount);
>>> +     nfserr = nfsd4_read_plus_readv(resp, read, &maxcount, eof);
>>> +     if (nfserr)
>>> +             return nfserr;
>>> +
>>> +     while (maxcount > 0) {
>>> +             vpage = xdr_buf_nth_page_address(xdr->buf, i, &pagelen);
>>> +             pagelen = min_t(unsigned int, pagelen, maxcount);
>>> +             if (!vpage || pagelen == 0)
>>> +                     break;
>>> +             p = memchr_inv(vpage, 0, pagelen);
>>> +             pagetype = (p == NULL) ? NFS4_CONTENT_HOLE : NFS4_CONTENT_DATA;
>>> +
>>> +             if (pagetype != segment.type || i == 0) {
>>> +                     if (likely(i > 0)) {
>>> +                             nfsd4_encode_read_plus_segment(xdr, &segment,
>>> +                                                           &bufpos, segments);
>>> +                             offset += segment.length;
>>> +                     }
>>> +                     segment.type = pagetype;
>>> +                     segment.offset = offset;
>>> +                     segment.length = pagelen;
>>> +                     segment.page_pos = i * PAGE_SIZE;
>>> +             } else
>>> +                     segment.length += pagelen;
>>> +
>>> +             maxcount -= pagelen;
>>> +             i++;
>>> +     }
>>> +
>>> +     nfsd4_encode_read_plus_segment(xdr, &segment, &bufpos, segments);
>>> +     xdr_truncate_encode(xdr, bufpos);
>>>      return nfs_ok;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> @@ -4813,69 +4853,31 @@ static __be32
>>> nfsd4_encode_read_plus(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, __be32 nfserr,
>>>                     struct nfsd4_read *read)
>>> {
>>> -     unsigned long maxcount, count;
>>>      struct xdr_stream *xdr = resp->xdr;
>>> -     struct file *file;
>>>      int starting_len = xdr->buf->len;
>>> -     int last_segment = xdr->buf->len;
>>> -     int segments = 0;
>>> -     __be32 *p, tmp;
>>> -     bool is_data;
>>> -     loff_t pos;
>>> +     unsigned int segments = 0;
>>>      u32 eof;
>>> 
>>>      if (nfserr)
>>>              return nfserr;
>>> -     file = read->rd_nf->nf_file;
>>> 
>>>      /* eof flag, segment count */
>>> -     p = xdr_reserve_space(xdr, 4 + 4);
>>> -     if (!p)
>>> +     if (!xdr_reserve_space(xdr, 4 + 4))
>>>              return nfserr_resource;
>>>      xdr_commit_encode(xdr);
>>> 
>>> -     maxcount = min_t(unsigned long, read->rd_length,
>>> -                      (xdr->buf->buflen - xdr->buf->len));
>>> -     count    = maxcount;
>>> -
>>> -     eof = read->rd_offset >= i_size_read(file_inode(file));
>>> +     eof = read->rd_offset >= i_size_read(file_inode(read->rd_nf->nf_file));
>>>      if (eof)
>>>              goto out;
>>> 
>>> -     pos = vfs_llseek(file, read->rd_offset, SEEK_HOLE);
>>> -     is_data = pos > read->rd_offset;
>>> -
>>> -     while (count > 0 && !eof) {
>>> -             maxcount = count;
>>> -             if (is_data)
>>> -                     nfserr = nfsd4_encode_read_plus_data(resp, read, &maxcount, &eof,
>>> -                                             segments == 0 ? &pos : NULL);
>>> -             else
>>> -                     nfserr = nfsd4_encode_read_plus_hole(resp, read, &maxcount, &eof);
>>> -             if (nfserr)
>>> -                     goto out;
>>> -             count -= maxcount;
>>> -             read->rd_offset += maxcount;
>>> -             is_data = !is_data;
>>> -             last_segment = xdr->buf->len;
>>> -             segments++;
>>> -     }
>>> -
>>> +     nfserr = nfsd4_encode_read_plus_segments(resp, read, &segments, &eof);
>>> out:
>>> -     if (nfserr && segments == 0)
>>> +     if (nfserr)
>>>              xdr_truncate_encode(xdr, starting_len);
>>>      else {
>>> -             if (nfserr) {
>>> -                     xdr_truncate_encode(xdr, last_segment);
>>> -                     nfserr = nfs_ok;
>>> -                     eof = 0;
>>> -             }
>>> -             tmp = htonl(eof);
>>> -             write_bytes_to_xdr_buf(xdr->buf, starting_len,     &tmp, 4);
>>> -             tmp = htonl(segments);
>>> -             write_bytes_to_xdr_buf(xdr->buf, starting_len + 4, &tmp, 4);
>>> +             xdr_encode_word(xdr->buf, starting_len,     eof);
>>> +             xdr_encode_word(xdr->buf, starting_len + 4, segments);
>>>      }
>>> -
>>>      return nfserr;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 2.36.1
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Chuck Lever

--
Chuck Lever




  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-16 20:35 [PATCH v1 0/6] NFSD: Improvements for the NFSv4.2 READ_PLUS operation Anna.Schumaker
2022-05-16 20:35 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] SUNRPC: Introduce xdr_stream_move_segment() Anna.Schumaker
2022-05-16 20:35 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] SUNRPC: Introduce xdr_encode_double() Anna.Schumaker
2022-05-16 20:35 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] SUNRPC: Introduce xdr_buf_trim_head() Anna.Schumaker
2022-05-16 20:35 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] SUNRPC: Introduce xdr_buf_nth_page_address() Anna.Schumaker
2022-05-16 20:35 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] SUNRPC: Export xdr_buf_pagecount() Anna.Schumaker
2022-05-16 20:35 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] NFSD: Repeal and replace the READ_PLUS implementation Anna.Schumaker
2022-05-16 21:37   ` Chuck Lever III
2022-05-17 13:39     ` Anna Schumaker
2022-05-17 13:53       ` Chuck Lever III [this message]
2022-05-17 14:55         ` Anna Schumaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6061D3BA-A457-4CA0-9638-9A7D90379610@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schumaker.anna@gmail.com \
    --cc=steved@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.