All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
	"Richard Hansen" <rhansen@rhansen.org>
Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH] doc: glossary: add entry for revision range
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 20:26:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60a317ab5068_149b6620891@natae.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1ra46f0h.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> > Junio C Hamano wrote:

> >> Perhaps.  Being illustrative for common use case is also important,
> >> so I do not mind teaching "missing endpoint at either side defaults
> >> to HEAD" early.
> >
> > A glossary is not a place to teach (anything other than the definition).
> > It's supposed to contain glosses (brief explanations).
> 
> Fair enough.  Then let's limit ourselves to the definition, but give
> a correct one.  It is not "syntax" that the phrase "revision range"
> refers to; it is what is specified by that syntax.

That's a distinction without a difference.

Like saying "Felipe is a person" is wrong, because "Felipe" is not a
person, but the _name_ of a person. This is excessive concern with minor
details to me.

In the minds of most people object identifiers are used interchangeably
with the object themselves: "Felipe" is a person, "master" is a branch, and
"master..@" is a revision range.

> [[def_revision_range]]revision range::
>         A set of connected commits to work on, usually specified by
>         giving two end points, like `origin..mytopic`.

endpoints.

As for the rest I already raised my concerns.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-16 20:37 [PATCH] doc: glossary: add entry for revision range Felipe Contreras
2021-05-17  7:46 ` Re* " Junio C Hamano
2021-05-17 10:30   ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-17 11:55     ` Jeff King
2021-05-17 17:22       ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-18  6:59         ` Jeff King
2021-05-18 12:28           ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-17 19:26       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-17 21:05         ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-18  0:51           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-18  1:26             ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2021-05-18  2:08           ` Jeff King
2021-05-18  2:57             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-18  5:20               ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-18  5:02             ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-18  6:55               ` Jeff King
2021-05-18 11:42                 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-18 12:47                   ` Jeff King
2021-05-18 21:09                     ` Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60a317ab5068_149b6620891@natae.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=rhansen@rhansen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.