From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E78C11F64 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA4461C3D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233507AbhF1SIP (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:08:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56710 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232717AbhF1SIL (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:08:11 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 115BDC061574 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id v6-20020a0568300906b0290464d9be9510so8225794ott.12 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:05:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nCt06aJVSdgKqzDX6LIWOJBlBkCZ/gzxkqnz1x24OKk=; b=NlbGAvVggNDC1fQyc9yNK/S+o7uT/HE3VwzvQPkk9ZQVxQ9cVGNUjQ2p4XMtKb+kYh fMdTKB5szc6edtyyVW2lUwxplp1Zp6Z7ZD4SdLx4oNNtLRkZOwDq+QxnUumqrfsxYEQ9 neqAz90brXMNlfbIqDpx9kXYuYSc1+eBT/3OD/hVYKIJXkwtAxPi4eWj78YRfirAcUBg WCnqpYdNYykxMqsLMriTaOtb09onNZvFw9JpuTs6jfzxlJYRUZNWjLib5EZjlkNnzEmn MDniHc1U7RY6OL7i9gzT1836FZbUA4rbL0epvCJhReph+MmeRDn2BRkZMRpQ8OrKvIi0 fJww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nCt06aJVSdgKqzDX6LIWOJBlBkCZ/gzxkqnz1x24OKk=; b=Y/vbrtRtruM5DRTz+FQZ4QPd1FytAt2c8uafkwFjTyknjU87O//ZcDoVm2ZEc93yff Ul1ImbmBGYQQqnqpwhbCI6GxQ1BLJ0nSRmt7uAIueisgKxCcZwBd7U9/plmw4ydwW+MW FssCpBVKNgFuCEFKeACFhtxxpsOCEBS2Imi/YQ/hZrl0u7OHXQdP09b4Lh036bY+49Mw rcDo0ZqI+LrIoklbrjvPuOQ0LVGQawiUCw4/2iNPpaePSU17YKUDP6OrpqQ9gAtAtG19 odEmZOZkZfSxPxG47Nd38+WsAGGmIxaT2hJEUjY0aqvy0MSpXEMn0wzszeAFkQaz2lGr cy2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530HI8OFvSJWOeGYmeyVwE3acNdUpsgDmDrEiPSVrsu2wH8ae3jQ H4TUzZBOsfhwR47BHMg6odc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuNG/5VmvnMghXQPvZeKxkQHlJSF4UAWfNAO2E0NGOpQ2+29I1PGNKNZVvPiw7jXM6jbvqBA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2315:: with SMTP id u21mr687696ote.327.1624903545270; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fixed-187-189-165-231.totalplay.net. [187.189.165.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j14sm3584418otn.18.2021.06.28.11.05.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:05:43 -0500 From: Felipe Contreras To: Junio C Hamano , Jeff King Cc: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , git@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Contreras , Phillip Wood Message-ID: <60da0f7742d73_1b8dc20826@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: References: <87mtrj2faq.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] help: colorize man pages if man.color=true under less(1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > I'm still entirely unconvinced that this should be in Git at all; > > pointing GIT_MAN_VIEWER or man.*.cmd at a color-man wrapper seems like > > it would be sufficient. But it feels like that conversation was not > > going anywhere productive; I mention it here only to indicate that my > > response above is not an endorsement of the concept. > > I have the same reaction to the patch. Do you care to explain why you think so? What is the alternative in your view? What configuration should users use instead? -- Felipe Contreras