From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailrelay1-2.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com (mailrelay1-2.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com [46.30.212.0]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.3390.1614894981409332531 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 13:56:22 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@berginkonsult.se header.s=20191106 header.b=Dfal9DdL; spf=none, err=permanent DNS error (domain: berginkonsult.se, ip: 46.30.212.0, mailfrom: peter@berginkonsult.se) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berginkonsult.se; s=20191106; h=content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to: subject:from; bh=rArz94oOvSodUNq8MAhot8MT1pqathXNmIdQ6FHRItw=; b=Dfal9DdLHyKipX+W8HbWCBu3OHnE6zroanpbGRXTn7tsOV5cG01pob/UCNp2dX0cy4K3NW/7SLZSI iiX5cDGA+/hjuqv/7/LjFYH2I9laWZIZeT5q/3xq4Kqovgg2X8Y1fei/PpHZkNGb+0lKn8Q+kmRn+k yvXF8A+RHcLriZxFJ3M3rxLZj5x/MvBDYC0AbyjDxbauzSBnZB1uoU6wYlbpZ5EoV9RD7YTnhMYCPZ 5ioUUWJKtXmFYGSErdCSBou1FfoER2ekqLlVqlFT1sN9SX6xUNJYMnJmE4NfFww7jHo3Wq8Yg3HAWI WqIjr0TFsczTa9R8UU02Floi9hcbRyA== X-HalOne-Cookie: a2989f9aa21d05dcb1bd823021ef48a659119523 X-HalOne-ID: 7264cac3-7d34-11eb-924c-d0431ea8a283 Received: from [192.168.100.132] (c188-151-59-206.bredband.comhem.se [188.151.59.206]) by mailrelay1.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 7264cac3-7d34-11eb-924c-d0431ea8a283; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Want to use linux-fslc 5.10 with Dunfell To: Andrey Zhizhikin , Brian Hutchinson Cc: Fabio Estevam , Otavio Salvador , meta-freescale@lists.yoctoproject.org References: <1668A8CAFCF24F79.31223@lists.yoctoproject.org> <1668DEDA4359AC1E.2939@lists.yoctoproject.org> <16692D851CD111AC.16452@lists.yoctoproject.org> <16693BE55864B434.22430@lists.yoctoproject.org> From: "Peter Bergin" Message-ID: <60ec3ce3-73fb-2e6c-e1da-901bdd5c5e5a@berginkonsult.se> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 22:56:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------EB4C400A8D449926E86DF60C" Content-Language: en-US --------------EB4C400A8D449926E86DF60C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 2021-03-04 21:49, Andrey Zhizhikin wrote: >> The build is running now so I'll monitor it. I'll report back after my 24 huskies are finished mushing out the image in about an hour. > No worries, keep us posted. An don't loose hope!:) > there is some strange issues with the build setup using repo manifest and I suspect the setup-environment script. When I built for Nano earlier today I did not use repo nor setup-environment. But I easily reproduced (I guess) the same issue as Brian sees only by using repo with master branch and setup-environment script. I also saw the strange thing that Brian noticed that after a horrible output from bitbake the second build in the same build dir succeeded. This is not related to boot-container so I will open a new fresh thread around this issue. Best regards, /Peter --------------EB4C400A8D449926E86DF60C Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On 2021-03-04 21:49, Andrey Zhizhikin wrote:
The build is running now so I'll monitor it.  I'll report back after my 24 huskies are finished mushing out the image in about an hour.

No worries, keep us posted. An don't loose hope! :)

there is some strange issues with the build setup using repo manifest and I suspect the setup-environment script. When I built for Nano earlier today I did not use repo nor setup-environment. But I easily reproduced (I guess) the same issue as Brian sees only by using repo with master branch and setup-environment script. I also saw the strange thing that Brian noticed that after a horrible output from bitbake the second build in the same build dir succeeded. This is not related to boot-container so I will open a new fresh thread around this issue.

Best regards,
/Peter


--------------EB4C400A8D449926E86DF60C--