From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: He Zhe Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:33:52 +0800 Message-ID: <615d1768-d6de-d10b-6124-e8aa3b6b6d38@windriver.com> References: <1560243834-266906-1-git-send-email-zhe.he@windriver.com> <20190612105114.GA23143@localhost> <1859381600.42862.1560337102909.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <0ea3a599-7adb-a001-dbdd-3843d0fa8b6e@windriver.com> <20190612145236.GA27613@joraj-alpa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190612145236.GA27613@joraj-alpa> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: openembedded-core-bounces-ZwoEplunGu3dfDuKDZ/zN51Ccm5ICvs9@public.gmane.org Errors-To: openembedded-core-bounces-ZwoEplunGu3dfDuKDZ/zN51Ccm5ICvs9@public.gmane.org To: Jonathan Rajotte-Julien Cc: openembedded-core , lttng-dev , Jeremie Galarneau , Mathieu Desnoyers , Adrian Bunk List-Id: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org On 6/12/19 10:52 PM, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien wrote: > Hi, > >>> Please don't base distributions on -rc tags. They are not meant for this. >>> >>> We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back >>> into our current stable release. So as soon as 5.2 final comes out, we will >>> release a 2.10.x version including support for it in lttng-modules. >> I'm one of the people who need to use lttng-modules on rc kernel. > If so, please use a git based recipe building the HEAD of the latest released > stable branch (stable-2.10 currently since 2.11 is in currently in the RC > stage). If you have problem, report them on our mailing list [1] or our bug > tracker [2]. We have extensive CI jobs for lttng-modules against the vanilla > kernel [3] and other usual suspects [4]. We normally catch those problems > quite quickly. Keep in mind that in no way should a production image be built > with a non tagged release. > > As for the oe-core recipe, please send us a quick email to let us know, patch > level releases are cheap. Keep in mind that we are chasing a moving target > here. > > To add to Mathieu statement, not only do we integrate support for newer kernels into > the current stable branch but also in all the supported stable branch when > possible. The supported stable release are normally the 3 latest minor-level releases. > Currently this set is : 2.8, 2.9, 2.10 . > > [1] https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev > [2] https://bugs.lttng.org/ > [3] An example of such job running: https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/job/lttng-modules_master_build-vanilla/648/console > This job validate that lttng-modules master builds against the following vanilla kernel tags. We have > similar jobs for master, stable 2.11, stable 2.10, stable 2.9, stable 2.10 lttng-modules branch. > v3.0.101 > v3.1.10 > v3.2.102 > v3.3.8 > v3.4.113 > v3.5.7 > v3.6.11 > v3.7.10 > v3.8.13 > v3.9.11 > v3.10.108 > v3.11.10 > v3.12.74 > v3.13.11 > v3.14.79 > v3.15.10 > v3.16.68 > v3.17.8 > v3.18.140 > v3.19.8 > v4.0.9 > v4.1.52 > v4.2.8 > v4.3.6 > v4.4.181 > v4.5.7 > v4.6.7 > v4.7.10 > v4.8.17 > v4.9.181 > v4.10.17 > v4.11.12 > v4.12.14 > v4.13.16 > v4.14.125 > v4.15.18 > v4.16.18 > v4.17.19 > v4.18.20 > v4.19.50 > v4.20.17 > v5.0.21 > v5.1.9 > v5.2-rc4 > [4] https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/ Thanks for your great input. Zhe > -- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail5.wrs.com (mail5.windriver.com [192.103.53.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99C47E908 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 02:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5E2Xwkg009100 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:34:19 -0700 Received: from [128.224.162.221] (128.224.162.221) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:33:56 -0700 To: Jonathan Rajotte-Julien References: <1560243834-266906-1-git-send-email-zhe.he@windriver.com> <20190612105114.GA23143@localhost> <1859381600.42862.1560337102909.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <0ea3a599-7adb-a001-dbdd-3843d0fa8b6e@windriver.com> <20190612145236.GA27613@joraj-alpa> From: He Zhe Message-ID: <615d1768-d6de-d10b-6124-e8aa3b6b6d38@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:33:52 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190612145236.GA27613@joraj-alpa> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.221] Cc: openembedded-core , lttng-dev , Jeremie Galarneau , Mathieu Desnoyers , Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 02:35:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 6/12/19 10:52 PM, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien wrote: > Hi, > >>> Please don't base distributions on -rc tags. They are not meant for this. >>> >>> We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back >>> into our current stable release. So as soon as 5.2 final comes out, we will >>> release a 2.10.x version including support for it in lttng-modules. >> I'm one of the people who need to use lttng-modules on rc kernel. > If so, please use a git based recipe building the HEAD of the latest released > stable branch (stable-2.10 currently since 2.11 is in currently in the RC > stage). If you have problem, report them on our mailing list [1] or our bug > tracker [2]. We have extensive CI jobs for lttng-modules against the vanilla > kernel [3] and other usual suspects [4]. We normally catch those problems > quite quickly. Keep in mind that in no way should a production image be built > with a non tagged release. > > As for the oe-core recipe, please send us a quick email to let us know, patch > level releases are cheap. Keep in mind that we are chasing a moving target > here. > > To add to Mathieu statement, not only do we integrate support for newer kernels into > the current stable branch but also in all the supported stable branch when > possible. The supported stable release are normally the 3 latest minor-level releases. > Currently this set is : 2.8, 2.9, 2.10 . > > [1] https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev > [2] https://bugs.lttng.org/ > [3] An example of such job running: https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/job/lttng-modules_master_build-vanilla/648/console > This job validate that lttng-modules master builds against the following vanilla kernel tags. We have > similar jobs for master, stable 2.11, stable 2.10, stable 2.9, stable 2.10 lttng-modules branch. > v3.0.101 > v3.1.10 > v3.2.102 > v3.3.8 > v3.4.113 > v3.5.7 > v3.6.11 > v3.7.10 > v3.8.13 > v3.9.11 > v3.10.108 > v3.11.10 > v3.12.74 > v3.13.11 > v3.14.79 > v3.15.10 > v3.16.68 > v3.17.8 > v3.18.140 > v3.19.8 > v4.0.9 > v4.1.52 > v4.2.8 > v4.3.6 > v4.4.181 > v4.5.7 > v4.6.7 > v4.7.10 > v4.8.17 > v4.9.181 > v4.10.17 > v4.11.12 > v4.12.14 > v4.13.16 > v4.14.125 > v4.15.18 > v4.16.18 > v4.17.19 > v4.18.20 > v4.19.50 > v4.20.17 > v5.0.21 > v5.1.9 > v5.2-rc4 > [4] https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/ Thanks for your great input. Zhe >