From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D814CC433E0 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75A520734 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ZFBnnFkz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726482AbgFCSNA (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 14:13:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34678 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725821AbgFCSNA (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 14:13:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2C93C08C5C0 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id x13so3391638wrv.4 for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 11:12:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JqtDpDFI1LWe2aNE+QdlEKbAzw7vqAaPQ3M+TSzYxOE=; b=ZFBnnFkzGR9EKMc2L9ZP/IaWyj5NFMkPDWC/tAud8dbYNhScYv4dF7UvYUJMQuKxfN 2iG2qQD5xaWMdejhqtPA5/GkS/om9eltTJcT8yfqdnA5lLQm2kVt5lmgWjWORKDtZeRE p/n9Bci+5zxrPrJ9fsH107A8H+rJTFHBthpMXN9AII7v+C1FirB7n5kEgWI8jkuq4li8 zdxJtLcHDkwvRaqEiR5Lr9ld/HsMwBN/3h0uKIqoVH27QWQkqX1EOMGpYfA4xlPNdze2 RDxi5XdX6ibXULyz6HJPxV0HLN572Xpq5GCELyzqmwhbZLKfTRuZQkrTGmpmRrllheRh FhvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JqtDpDFI1LWe2aNE+QdlEKbAzw7vqAaPQ3M+TSzYxOE=; b=i9S1P0W8Wtn7RcC96V0U9RHbUqFipPcjE1gH7URGt9vpJAmkgN7bnXQQaH7DdOV114 a083ucVWOSOzXeheOv1275t0oUcVUDjQNxpNi1MDfvGa14AO0efvTyncQafXU3qumZOs uyrni0MEHpSELUjZ3Us2rb6x4/pGMVfujRuX7arnHvzGYtxIsSmayA2YKfZqSdz09hp6 syzfLIOOXHwmPvAQkMk6hgnbDZuMsMnkuRBx8DZ7gGSu28md4mYLC8KCpy6k0+jIMNJu 7okNcNc8Af9FgzMZtAqwzzWa35xOpAIEvUYNGd16yT+QTU1JwPo6Bd4r/Fd1VcDzt4Tt nEcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ppqDHcGRE0+FB6iyVvG84He0wvixWrW+ELCTxDY9DXFfIGzHx Sct28/m/kXp95tLSJaFw1fs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+2yc3csM6ovSLyU3EEZ16NdjEE/PKX2nUmZdfn9imS1JF/9maB0IGGcQxAcIukh+XUkGYyw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e2c9:: with SMTP id d9mr630493wrj.227.1591207978446; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 11:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (ip68-111-84-250.oc.oc.cox.net. [68.111.84.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h74sm4695409wrh.76.2020.06.03.11.12.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jun 2020 11:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 8/8] selftests: net: Add port split test To: Danielle Ratson , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, michael.chan@broadcom.com, kuba@kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, saeedm@mellanox.com, leon@kernel.org, jiri@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com, snelson@pensando.io, drivers@pensando.io, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com, Petr Machata References: <20200602113119.36665-1-danieller@mellanox.com> <20200602113119.36665-9-danieller@mellanox.com> From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: <619b71e5-57c2-0368-f1b6-8b052819cd22@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:12:51 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200602113119.36665-9-danieller@mellanox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 6/2/2020 4:31 AM, Danielle Ratson wrote: > Test port split configuration using previously added number of port lanes > attribute. > > Check that all the splittable ports are successfully split to their maximum > number of lanes and below, and that those which are not splittable fail to > be split. > > Test output example: > > TEST: swp4 is unsplittable [ OK ] > TEST: split port swp53 into 4 [ OK ] > TEST: Unsplit port pci/0000:03:00.0/25 [ OK ] > TEST: split port swp53 into 2 [ OK ] > TEST: Unsplit port pci/0000:03:00.0/25 [ OK ] > > Signed-off-by: Danielle Ratson > Reviewed-by: Petr Machata > --- > tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile | 1 + > .../selftests/net/devlink_port_split.py | 259 ++++++++++++++++++ Any reason why this is written in python versus shell? -- Florian