[PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.15.23-rc1

Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
    crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: fix SMB 3.11 posix extension mount failure

Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
    KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest

Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
    arm64: Add Cortex-A510 CPU part definition

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                         | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 ++
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         | 2 ++
 crypto/algapi.c                  | 1 +
 crypto/api.c                     | 1 -
 drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c    | 2 +-
 fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c               | 2 +-
 7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

[PATCH 5.15 1/5] moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit bd2db32e7c3e35bd4d9b8bbff689434a50893546 upstream.

It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it
was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of
the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.

Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
Cc: Xin Xiong <xiongx18@fudan.edu.cn>
Cc: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: whitehat002 <hackyzh002@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127071638.4057899-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c
@@ -705,12 +705,12 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform
 	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(host->dma_chan_rx))
 		dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan_rx);
 	mmc_remove_host(mmc);
-	mmc_free_host(mmc);
 
 	writel(0, host->base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK);
 	writel(0, host->base + REG_POWER_CONTROL);
 	writel(readl(host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF,
 	       host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL);
+	mmc_free_host(mmc);
 
 	return 0;
 }

[PATCH 5.15 2/5] arm64: Add Cortex-A510 CPU part definition

From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

commit 53960faf2b731dd2f9ed6e1334634b8ba6286850 upstream.

Add the CPU Partnumbers for the new Arm designs.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1643120437-14352-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
 #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A76		0xD0B
 #define ARM_CPU_PART_NEOVERSE_N1	0xD0C
 #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A77		0xD0D
+#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A510	0xD46
 
 #define APM_CPU_PART_POTENZA		0x000
 
@@ -113,6 +114,7 @@
 #define MIDR_CORTEX_A76	MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A76)
 #define MIDR_NEOVERSE_N1 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_NEOVERSE_N1)
 #define MIDR_CORTEX_A77	MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A77)
+#define MIDR_CORTEX_A510 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A510)
 #define MIDR_THUNDERX	MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM, CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX)
 #define MIDR_THUNDERX_81XX MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM, CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX_81XX)
 #define MIDR_THUNDERX_83XX MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM, CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX_83XX)



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 5.15 2/5] arm64: Add Cortex-A510 CPU part definition

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

commit 53960faf2b731dd2f9ed6e1334634b8ba6286850 upstream.

Add the CPU Partnumbers for the new Arm designs.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1643120437-14352-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
 #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A76		0xD0B
 #define ARM_CPU_PART_NEOVERSE_N1	0xD0C
 #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A77		0xD0D
+#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A510	0xD46
 
 #define APM_CPU_PART_POTENZA		0x000
 
@@ -113,6 +114,7 @@
 #define MIDR_CORTEX_A76	MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A76)
 #define MIDR_NEOVERSE_N1 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_NEOVERSE_N1)
 #define MIDR_CORTEX_A77	MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A77)
+#define MIDR_CORTEX_A510 MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM, ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A510)
 #define MIDR_THUNDERX	MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM, CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX)
 #define MIDR_THUNDERX_81XX MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM, CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX_81XX)
 #define MIDR_THUNDERX_83XX MIDR_CPU_MODEL(ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM, CAVIUM_CPU_PART_THUNDERX_83XX)

[PATCH 5.15 3/5] KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>

commit 2c212e1baedcd782b2535a3f86bc491977677c0e upstream.

Refuse SIDA memops on guests which are not protected.
For normal guests, the secure instruction data address designation,
which determines the location we access, is not under control of KVM.

Fixes: 19e122776886 (KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer)
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -4708,6 +4708,8 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_sida_op(struc
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (mop->size + mop->sida_offset > sida_size(vcpu->arch.sie_block))
 		return -E2BIG;
+	if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	switch (mop->op) {
 	case KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ:

[PATCH 5.15 4/5] ksmbd: fix SMB 3.11 posix extension mount failure

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>

commit 9ca8581e79e51c57e60b3b8e3b89d816448f49fe upstream.

cifs client set 4 to DataLength of create_posix context, which mean
Mode variable of create_posix context is only available. So buffer
validation of ksmbd should check only the size of Mode except for
the size of Reserved variable.

Fixes: 8f77150c15f8 ("ksmbd: add buffer validation for SMB2_CREATE_CONTEXT")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15+
Reported-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
@@ -2690,7 +2690,7 @@ int smb2_open(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 					(struct create_posix *)context;
 				if (le16_to_cpu(context->DataOffset) +
 				    le32_to_cpu(context->DataLength) <
-				    sizeof(struct create_posix)) {
+				    sizeof(struct create_posix) - 4) {
 					rc = -EINVAL;
 					goto err_out1;
 				}

[PATCH 5.15 5/5] crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

commit c6ce9c5831cae515d375a01b97ae1778689acf19 upstream.

The soft dependency on cryptomgr is only needed in algapi because
if algapi isn't present then no algorithms can be loaded.  This
also fixes the case where api is built-in but algapi is built as
a module as the soft dependency would otherwise get lost.

Fixes: 8ab23d547f65 ("crypto: api - Add softdep on cryptomgr")
Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Tested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 crypto/algapi.c |    1 +
 crypto/api.c    |    1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/crypto/algapi.c
+++ b/crypto/algapi.c
@@ -1277,3 +1277,4 @@ module_exit(crypto_algapi_exit);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic algorithms API");
+MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");
--- a/crypto/api.c
+++ b/crypto/api.c
@@ -603,4 +603,3 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_req_done);
 
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic core API");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");

RE: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Fox Chen]

On Wed,  9 Feb 2022 20:14:25 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

5.15.23-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
                
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 2/9/22 11:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:14:25 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.15:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    114 tests:	114 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.15.23-rc1-g722769939d60
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.15.23-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 722769939d600370e0f75656c6076add1736919a
* git describe: v5.15.21-118-g722769939d60
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.21-118-g722769939d60

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 87812, pass: 74191, fail: 495, skip: 10102, xfail: 824

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 39 passed, 13 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 20 passed, 4 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee]

Hi Greg,

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 62 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 100 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/735
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/739
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/743

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 488 pass: 488 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On 10/02/22 02.14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, gcc 10.2.0)
and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, gcc 11.2.0).

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review

[Slade Watkins]

On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Compiled and booted 5.15.23-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <slade@sladewatkins.com>

Thanks,
Slade