From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33289) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJ20B-0005IX-4r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:26:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJ20A-0007CJ-4k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:26:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]:34819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJ209-00079I-RV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:26:50 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id g8so8183357pgf.2 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:26:49 -0700 (PDT) References: <20190420073442.7488-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <6206270f-2994-ae8d-db89-346a06a684f1@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:26:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/38] tcg vector improvements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Hildenbrand , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 4/23/19 12:15 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 20.04.19 09:34, Richard Henderson wrote: >> Based-on: tcg-next, which at present is only tcg_gen_extract2. >> >> The dupm patches have been on list before, with a larger context >> of supporting tcg/ppc. The rest of the set was written to support >> David's s390 vector patches. In particular: >> >> (1) Add vector absolute value. >> (2) Add vector shift by non-constant scalar. >> (3) Add vector shift by vector. >> (4) Add vector select. > > Remind me, is this for VECTOR SELECT on s390x where we already added a > vector variant? At least VECTOR SELECT on s390x works on bit, not > element granularity. No, this was more for implementing _vec helpers, where we can reasonably use element granularity (since that's all x86 has). I thought about adding a bitsel alongside cmpsel, to work on bits like this, but haven't yet. r~