All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: "liujian (CE)" <liujian56@huawei.com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: "ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"andrii@kernel.org" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"songliubraving@fb.com" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	"yhs@fb.com" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"john.fastabend@gmail.com" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"kpsingh@kernel.org" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"sdf@google.com" <sdf@google.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next] net: Use skb->len to check the validity of the parameters in bpf_skb_load_bytes
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 21:00:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <623160c966680_94df20819@john.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f937ace70a3458580c6242fa68ea549@huawei.com>

liujian (CE) wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin KaFai Lau [mailto:kafai@fb.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 3:58 AM
> > To: liujian (CE) <liujian56@huawei.com>
> > Cc: ast@kernel.org; daniel@iogearbox.net; andrii@kernel.org;
> > songliubraving@fb.com; yhs@fb.com; john.fastabend@gmail.com;
> > kpsingh@kernel.org; davem@davemloft.net; kuba@kernel.org;
> > sdf@google.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] net: Use skb->len to check the validity of the
> > parameters in bpf_skb_load_bytes
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:39:16PM +0800, Liu Jian wrote:
> > > The data length of skb frags + frag_list may be greater than 0xffff,
> > > so here use skb->len to check the validity of the parameters.
> > What is the use case that needs to look beyond 0xffff ?

> I use sockmap with strparser, the stm->strp.offset (the begin of one
> application layer protocol message) maybe beyond 0xffff, but i need
> load the message head to do something.

This would explain skb_load_bytes but not the other two right? Also
if we are doing this why not just remove those two checks in
flow_dissector_load() I think skb_header_pointer() does duplicate
checks. Please check.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-16  4:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-15 12:39 [PATCH bpf-next] net: Use skb->len to check the validity of the parameters in bpf_skb_load_bytes Liu Jian
2022-03-15 19:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-03-16  1:09   ` liujian (CE)
2022-03-16  4:00     ` John Fastabend [this message]
2022-03-16 13:08       ` liujian (CE)
2022-03-16 15:09         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-03-17 14:08           ` liujian (CE)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=623160c966680_94df20819@john.notmuch \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=liujian56@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.