All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: Re: linux 5.17.1 disregarding ACK values resulting in stalled TCP connections
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 13:36:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <628a909d-1090-dc62-a730-fd9514079218@uls.co.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+6LCWOZahAi_vPf9H=SKw-4vdMTj5T0dYsp1Se4g9-yw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Eric,

On 2022/04/01 02:54, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:41 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:33 PM Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll deploy same on a dev host we've got in the coming week and start a
>>> bisect process.
>> Thanks, this will definitely help.
> One thing I noticed in your pcap is a good amount of drops, as if
> Hystart was not able to stop slow-start before the drops are
> happening.
>
> TFO with one less RTT at connection establishment could be the trigger.
>
> If you are still using cubic, please try to revert.
Sorry, I understand TCP itself a bit, but I've given up trying to
understand the various schedulers a long time ago and am just using the
defaults that the kernel provides.  How do I check what I'm using, and
how can I change that?  What is recommended at this stage?
>
>
> commit 4e1fddc98d2585ddd4792b5e44433dcee7ece001
> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Date:   Tue Nov 23 12:25:35 2021 -0800
>
>     tcp_cubic: fix spurious Hystart ACK train detections for
> not-cwnd-limited flows
Ok, instead of starting with bisect, if I can reproduce in dev I'll use
this one first.

Kind Regards,
Jaco

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-01 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-30  0:56 linux 5.17.1 disregarding ACK values resulting in stalled TCP connections Jaco
2022-03-30  2:01 ` Neal Cardwell
2022-03-30  2:40   ` Eric Dumazet
2022-03-30  2:58   ` Jaco Kroon
2022-03-30  3:48     ` Eric Dumazet
2022-03-30  6:22       ` Jaco Kroon
2022-03-30 13:56         ` Neal Cardwell
2022-03-30 15:00           ` Jaco Kroon
2022-03-30 16:19             ` Eric Dumazet
2022-03-31 15:41               ` Neal Cardwell
2022-03-31 23:06                 ` Jaco Kroon
2022-04-01  0:10                   ` Eric Dumazet
2022-04-01  0:15                     ` Florian Westphal
2022-04-01 11:54                       ` Jaco Kroon
2022-04-01 12:09                         ` Florian Westphal
2022-04-01  0:33                     ` Jaco Kroon
2022-04-01  0:41                       ` Eric Dumazet
2022-04-01  0:54                         ` Eric Dumazet
2022-04-01 11:36                           ` Jaco Kroon [this message]
2022-04-01 13:54                             ` Eric Dumazet
2022-04-01 14:50                   ` Neal Cardwell
2022-04-01 15:39                     ` Neal Cardwell
2022-04-01 15:48                       ` Neal Cardwell
2022-04-02  8:42                       ` Jaco Kroon
2022-04-02 13:20                         ` Eric Dumazet
2022-04-02 22:02                           ` Jaco Kroon
2022-04-02 14:14                         ` Florian Westphal
2022-04-02 15:57                           ` Neal Cardwell
2022-04-02 21:51                           ` Jaco Kroon
2022-04-02 16:29                         ` Neal Cardwell
2022-04-02 16:32                           ` Eric Dumazet
2022-04-02 18:04                             ` Neal Cardwell
2022-04-06 13:58                               ` Florian Westphal
2022-04-06 19:04                                 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2022-04-07 10:26                                   ` Florian Westphal
2022-04-07 12:48                                     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2022-04-21 21:14                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2022-04-25  9:29                                         ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=628a909d-1090-dc62-a730-fd9514079218@uls.co.za \
    --to=jaco@uls.co.za \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.