On 10/02/2017 09:39 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all. Here is a continuation of my "new backup architecture" series,
> The very first part, but it is meaningful itself.
> 
> 01: was previously sent in other my series, but here is more correct
>     version, one mistake is fixed.
> 02: only rebased to new byte-based interfaces (by Eric), r-bs saved

Presumably, that means we need to tell patchew:

Based-on:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-09/msg06848.html
[PATCH v10 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based

> 03: changed to use hbitmap_next_zero, also a comment added to
>     none-mode (Fam)
> 04: commit message rewritten. The patch was controversial, but I need
>     it for further backup enhancement, so, let's continue the
>     discussion.
> 05: rebased, logic is not changed, r-bs saved
> 
> 
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (5):
>   hbitmap: add next_zero function
>   backup: move from done_bitmap to copy_bitmap
>   backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap for incremental
>   backup: simplify non-dirty bits progress processing
>   backup: use copy_bitmap in incremental backup
> 
>  include/block/dirty-bitmap.h |   1 +
>  include/qemu/hbitmap.h       |   8 +++
>  block/backup.c               | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  block/dirty-bitmap.c         |   5 ++
>  util/hbitmap.c               |  29 +++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org