From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 9B8E6E00D9A; Thu, 5 May 2016 06:45:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.181 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com (mail-pf0-f181.google.com [209.85.192.181]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B95E00D13 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 06:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 77so37863171pfv.2 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 06:45:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=sHNeBCiRpAduvctu0ioSYxAjnBetsuebngHJhKRMiVE=; b=BqObb3MdVHPD+v6f/1ICn6Ypw572zzqAU11AQ6MieX6OunvNHrGs4S0BtRP1E2klNb pR08DlE19zDb4ZIhbjnNCaxL6gylyl6qDKO9f9jNvyTxlkLacdLIq0R68hYrj08vhxQT szwrWBJgQ6v+MFSjBqHscfBIbyd/Ve9l3IGh/l/R8hS687Tu7WP0NCgQEJeEtxYphB+S YQVFR1EB+iQ+ULAABeijRkifIHTbYKGK5sxSDexeqjk7ARzR2tNBEsPFHDA0iQfREqme OFJjPe4tVkp1LEagGq3u++64EFrOmfDCHtyexvdtiPkET+lCQ+SRDNwdnc9ZvzTVc8ZJ juMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=sHNeBCiRpAduvctu0ioSYxAjnBetsuebngHJhKRMiVE=; b=j23wz6iAIh56n9FrvcT+Mg29/ikivdz6iBO5yJ+/RSsmv4zUtKZIsU4GJKo2WrB1ft dCw5VRW3eF817CTNeYPJbFpW2ACFPSM3TnMmhgeXxCX8VJLWc/V3fDaCt92VtTsYIjLn JmwwcdaLjpbtXXyd+7Jqt/xFk4se1ld2Qp5t78Mtu7oCGGanfxd0qEfofzCootqUSlge 9MFv9J1725xtFHFMHB21UNR22rfgTOc3eOBqjDc2L5EXIlNJKzo8+0pfgS4yeI8Au61J /6OiXiHkw+3BWck6VhWA64zDkymshZivO17HzMglO3WEivLEwkYnpZdpViDdW7TVGU9w eqYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWv4W2MI401s4e8uj4bgWcLb0nf8DYEVp06vLuOF/dsmgns3N3horQucpw8wBXShA== X-Received: by 10.98.89.28 with SMTP id n28mr20773011pfb.41.1462455943210; Thu, 05 May 2016 06:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:8800:5a9a:71b9:fe2a:3a93:3971? ([2601:646:8800:5a9a:71b9:fe2a:3a93:3971]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e87sm13992709pfb.76.2016.05.05.06.45.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 May 2016 06:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2 From: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: <20160505020837.GA20829@nyx.americas.hpqcorp.net> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 06:45:36 -0700 Message-Id: <6311B206-D2A3-4CC1-A034-7900EF2E6E21@gmail.com> References: <20160505020837.GA20829@nyx.americas.hpqcorp.net> To: "Marcelo E. Magallon" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Multiple MACHINEs in a single build? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 13:45:45 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 29864 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0862EA5E-A8A5-4BF5-A930-3FFFA1A6865B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 --Apple-Mail=_0862EA5E-A8A5-4BF5-A930-3FFFA1A6865B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On May 4, 2016, at 7:08 PM, Marcelo E. Magallon = wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I suspect this is documented in a FAQ somewhere, but I'm failing to = hit > the correct keywords when googling... >=20 > Is there a way to support building images for multiple MACHINEs in a > single workspace at the same time? >=20 > This works: >=20 > $ MACHINE=3Dqemux86 bitbake core-image-minimal > $ MACHINE=3Dqemux86-64 bitbake core-image-minimal >=20 > and bitbake parallelizes the build across tasks. What I'm trying to > figure out is if it's possible to run two bitbake instances with > different MACHINE values on different hosts but writing to the same > workspace (say, over NFS). Thats not possible and its by design. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Marcelo > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto --Apple-Mail=_0862EA5E-A8A5-4BF5-A930-3FFFA1A6865B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlcrToQACgkQuwUzVZGdMxTg1gCeNAp7TQLax2wFPBvj90o60ZwU aE4AnRLVS0ubib/euZLnPAG3jtI2MjuQ =zAqT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_0862EA5E-A8A5-4BF5-A930-3FFFA1A6865B--