All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: renesas_wdt: don't sleep in atomic context
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:27:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63c0b5ba-fe18-b667-d346-880287061c46@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201219173415.21848-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

On 12/19/20 9:34 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> In the restart handler, we hit multiple OOPSes. One because of
> usleep_range() and one because of RPM. So, instead of re-using
> rwdt_start(), we implement an atomic version of it in the restart
> handler. As a little bonus, reboot will occur sooner because we can now
> use the smallest divider in the custom restart routine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
> 
> It is problematic to add a Fixes: tag because we would need three of
> them. So, I'd think we add a stable tag and as long as the patch
> applies, all is fine. Other opinions?
> 
>  drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c
> index 47fce4de0110..d2b5074bca65 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ struct rwdt_priv {
>  	struct watchdog_device wdev;
>  	unsigned long clk_rate;
>  	u8 cks;
> +	struct clk *clk;
>  };
>  
>  static void rwdt_write(struct rwdt_priv *priv, u32 val, unsigned int reg)
> @@ -125,13 +127,30 @@ static unsigned int rwdt_get_timeleft(struct watchdog_device *wdev)
>  	return DIV_BY_CLKS_PER_SEC(priv, 65536 - val);
>  }
>  
> +/* needs to be atomic - no RPM, no usleep_range, no scheduling! */
>  static int rwdt_restart(struct watchdog_device *wdev, unsigned long action,
>  			void *data)
>  {
>  	struct rwdt_priv *priv = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdev);
> +	u8 val;
> +
> +	clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> +
> +	/* Stop the timer before we modify any register */
> +	val = readb_relaxed(priv->base + RWTCSRA) & ~RWTCSRA_TME;
> +	rwdt_write(priv, val, RWTCSRA);
> +	/* Delay 2 cycles before setting watchdog counter */
> +	udelay(DIV_ROUND_UP(2 * 1000000, priv->clk_rate));
>  
> -	rwdt_start(wdev);
>  	rwdt_write(priv, 0xffff, RWTCNT);
> +	/* smallest divider to reboot soon */
> +	rwdt_write(priv, 0, RWTCSRA);
> +
> +	readb_poll_timeout_atomic(priv->base + RWTCSRA, val,
> +				  !(val & RWTCSRA_WRFLG), 1, 100);
> +
> +	rwdt_write(priv, RWTCSRA_TME, RWTCSRA);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -191,7 +210,6 @@ static int rwdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct rwdt_priv *priv;
> -	struct clk *clk;
>  	unsigned long clks_per_sec;
>  	int ret, i;
>  	u8 csra;
> @@ -207,13 +225,13 @@ static int rwdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
>  		return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
>  
> -	clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> -	if (IS_ERR(clk))
> -		return PTR_ERR(clk);
> +	priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
>  
>  	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>  	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> -	priv->clk_rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
> +	priv->clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
>  	csra = readb_relaxed(priv->base + RWTCSRA);
>  	priv->wdev.bootstatus = csra & RWTCSRA_WOVF ? WDIOF_CARDRESET : 0;
>  	pm_runtime_put(dev);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-21 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-19 17:34 [PATCH] watchdog: renesas_wdt: don't sleep in atomic context Wolfram Sang
2020-12-21 16:27 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2020-12-22  8:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-12-27 14:11 ` Niklas Söderlund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63c0b5ba-fe18-b667-d346-880287061c46@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.