From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkg: add dkms to build kernel module Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 18:04:23 +0100 Message-ID: <6436237.sUZdnsUm2n@xps13> References: <20170118214505.30663-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ricardo.salveti@linaro.org To: Anders Roxell Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E03952 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:05:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id c85so169515465wmi.1 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 09:05:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170118214505.30663-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, So the idea is to package DPDK kernel modules with DKMS. And if we do not want to use DKMS, we just have to remove this part? Could we better identify the DKMS part to remove? Or add a variable to switch between the 2 modes? 2017-01-18 22:45, Anders Roxell: > +MAKE="source /usr/share/dpdk/buildtools/dpdk-sdk-env.sh; make MODULE_CFLAGS='-I/usr/include/dpdk -include /usr/include/dpdk/rte_config.h'" What is dpdk-sdk-env.sh?